| Provider | MiniMax |
|---|---|
| Model ID | minimax/minimax-m2.7 |
| Prompt Price per 1M tokens | $0.18 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.72 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.54 |
| Context Window | 204.8K |
| Release Date | |
| Popularity | #25 |
| Popularity Signal | 47.7B tokens |
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax API model specs with normalized input price, output price, context window, sample workload cost, and related comparisons.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget brief
MiniMax M2.7 is estimated at $0.54 for the standard workload.
MiniMax M2.7 is best suited for cost-sensitive production traffic. A 1M input token plus 500K output token workload is estimated at $0.54.
Input price$0.18per 1M tokens
Output price$0.72per 1M tokens
Context window204.8Kreported maximum
Popularity#2547.7B tokens signal volume
Use this as a first-pass planning estimate, then verify provider limits, routing, discounts, and availability before production deployment.
Estimate your workload cost
Estimate this model for your workload
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Alternative path
Alternative Shortlist
Use these rows to build a test shortlist around MiniMax M2.7. Lower cost, same-provider fit, and larger context are separate decisions, so each group is ranked by a different signal.
Lower-cost alternatives
Cross-provider candidates with a lower standard 1M input plus 500K output estimate.
| Model | Provider | Sample Cost | Context | Why it is here | Next Step |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥Owl Alpha | OpenRouter | $0 | 1.05M | Lower standard workload estimate from another provider. | Open model Compare |
| New🔥Nemotron 3 Ultra (free) | NVIDIA | $0 | 1M | Lower standard workload estimate from another provider. | Open model Compare |
| 🔥Laguna M.1 (free) | Poolside | $0 | 262.14K | Lower standard workload estimate from another provider. | Open model Compare |
| Nemotron 3 Super (free) | NVIDIA | $0 | 1M | Lower standard workload estimate from another provider. | Open model Compare |
Same-provider swaps
Lower-cost options from the same provider, useful when account setup or procurement is already fixed.
| Model | Provider | Sample Cost | Context | Why it is here | Next Step |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax M2.5 (free) | MiniMax | $0 | 204.8K | Same provider with a lower standard workload estimate. | Open model Compare |
| MiniMax M2.5 | MiniMax | $0.36 | 204.8K | Same provider with a lower standard workload estimate. | Open model Compare |
Larger-context upgrades near this budget
Models with more context that stay within a close sample-cost band when price data is available.
| Model | Provider | Sample Cost | Context | Why it is here | Next Step |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 4 Scout | Meta | $0.25 | 10M | More context while staying near this model's sample-cost band. | Open model Compare |
| 🔥Owl Alpha | OpenRouter | $0 | 1.05M | More context while staying near this model's sample-cost band. | Open model Compare |
| 🔥DeepSeek V4 Flash | DeepSeek | $0.18 | 1.05M | More context while staying near this model's sample-cost band. | Open model Compare |
| 🔥MiMo-V2.5 | Xiaomi | $0.24 | 1.05M | More context while staying near this model's sample-cost band. | Open model Compare |
MiniMax-M2.7 is a next-generation large language model designed for autonomous, real-world productivity and continuous improvement. Built to actively participate in its own evolution, M2.7 integrates advanced agentic capabilities through multi-agent...
MiniMax M2.7 is best suited for cost-sensitive production traffic.
A 1M input token plus 500K output token workload is estimated at $0.54.
Decision Shortcuts
Compare this model
Search head-to-head pages that include MiniMax M2.7 and review input price, output price, context, and sample workload cost.
Find comparisonsMiniMax catalog
See other MiniMax models before narrowing your shortlist.
Open provider hubCheaper alternatives
Start from models sorted by a standard cost estimate when budget is the first constraint.
Browse low-cost modelsLong-context alternatives
Compare large-context models for retrieval, documents, and codebase review.
Browse long-context modelsHigh-Interest Comparisons
Search this model| Comparison | Cost-first Pick | Context Pick |
|---|---|---|
| MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
| 🔥Hy3 preview vs MiniMax M2.7 | Hy3 preview | Hy3 preview |
| MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3 Coder Next | Qwen3 Coder Next | Qwen3 Coder Next |
| MiniMax M2.7 vs Grok 4.3 | MiniMax M2.7 | Grok 4.3 |
| 🔥DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MiniMax M2.7 | MiniMax M2.7 | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Kimi K2.6 vs MiniMax M2.7 | MiniMax M2.7 | Kimi K2.6 |
Popular Comparisons
Search all comparisons| Comparison | Newest Release |
|---|---|
| 🔥Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiniMax M2.7 | |
| 🔥Claude Opus 4.7 vs MiniMax M2.7 | |
| 🔥Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs MiniMax M2.7 | |
| 🔥DeepSeek V3.2 vs MiniMax M2.7 | |
| 🔥DeepSeek V4 Flash vs MiniMax M2.7 | |
| 🔥DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MiniMax M2.7 | |
| 🔥Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs MiniMax M2.7 | |
| 🔥Gemini 2.5 Flash vs MiniMax M2.7 | |
| 🔥Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs MiniMax M2.7 | |
| 🔥Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs MiniMax M2.7 |