| Provider | inclusionAI |
|---|---|
| Model ID | inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-fin |
| Prompt Price per 1M tokens | $0.042 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.1232 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.1 |
| Context Window | 262.14K |
| Release Date |
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
inclusionAI API model specs with normalized input price, output price, context window, sample workload cost, and related comparisons.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget brief
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is estimated at $0.1 for the standard workload.
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is best suited for cost-sensitive production traffic. A 1M input token plus 500K output token workload is estimated at $0.1.
Input price$0.042per 1M tokens
Output price$0.1232per 1M tokens
Context window262.14Kreported maximum
Releasecatalog timestamp
Use this as a first-pass planning estimate, then verify provider limits, routing, discounts, and availability before production deployment.
Estimate your workload cost
Estimate this model for your workload
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Alternative path
Alternative Shortlist
Use these rows to build a test shortlist around Ling 3.0 Flash Fin. Lower cost, same-provider fit, and larger context are separate decisions, so each group is ranked by a different signal.
Lower-cost alternatives
Cross-provider candidates with a lower standard 1M input plus 500K output estimate.
| Model | Provider | Sample Cost | Context | Why it is here | Next Step |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥Nemotron 3 Ultra (free) | NVIDIA | $0 | 1M | Lower standard workload estimate from another provider. | Open model Compare |
| NewXing4.0 29B A4B (free) | XingChen | $0 | 262.14K | Lower standard workload estimate from another provider. | Open model Compare |
| NewNemotron 3.5 Super VL (free) | NVIDIA | $0 | 1M | Lower standard workload estimate from another provider. | Open model Compare |
| Apodex 1.1 Mini (free) | Apodex | $0 | 262.14K | Lower standard workload estimate from another provider. | Open model Compare |
Same-provider swaps
Lower-cost options from the same provider, useful when account setup or procurement is already fixed.
| Model | Provider | Sample Cost | Context | Why it is here | Next Step |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) | inclusionAI | $0 | 262.14K | Same provider with a lower standard workload estimate. | Open model Compare |
| Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) | inclusionAI | $0 | 262.14K | Same provider with a lower standard workload estimate. | Open model Compare |
| Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) | inclusionAI | $0 | 262.14K | Same provider with a lower standard workload estimate. | Open model Compare |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) | inclusionAI | $0 | 262.14K | Same provider with a lower standard workload estimate. | Open model Compare |
Larger-context upgrades near this budget
Models with more context that stay within a close sample-cost band when price data is available.
| Model | Provider | Sample Cost | Context | Why it is here | Next Step |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Owl Alpha | OpenRouter | $0 | 1.05M | More context while staying near this model's sample-cost band. | Open model Compare |
| 🔥DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | DeepSeek | $0.09 | 1.05M | More context while staying near this model's sample-cost band. | Open model Compare |
| 🔥GLM 5.3 Flash | Z.ai | $0.14 | 1.05M | More context while staying near this model's sample-cost band. | Open model Compare |
| DeepSeek Flash Latest | DeepSeek | $0.12 | 1.05M | More context while staying near this model's sample-cost band. | Open model Compare |
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is a finance-focused mixture-of-experts model from InclusionAI, built on Ling 3.0 Flash with 5.1B active parameters out of 124B total. It is designed for real-world investment...
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is best suited for cost-sensitive production traffic.
A 1M input token plus 500K output token workload is estimated at $0.1.
Decision Shortcuts
Compare this model
Search head-to-head pages that include Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and review input price, output price, context, and sample workload cost.
Find comparisonsinclusionAI catalog
See other inclusionAI models before narrowing your shortlist.
Open provider hubCheaper alternatives
Start from models sorted by a standard cost estimate when budget is the first constraint.
Browse low-cost modelsLong-context alternatives
Compare large-context models for retrieval, documents, and codebase review.
Browse long-context modelsHigh-Interest Comparisons
Search this model| Comparison | Cost-first Pick | Context Pick |
|---|---|---|
| No high-interest comparison is currently available for this model. | ||
Popular Comparisons
Search all comparisons| Comparison | Newest Release |
|---|---|
| Aion 3.5 Mini vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin | |
| Aion 3.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin | |
| Apodex 1.1 Mini (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin | |
| NewBeam 1.0 501B A23B vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin | |
| Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin | |
| Claude Fable 5.1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin | |
| Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin | |
| NewClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin | |
| Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin | |
| 🔥Claude Opus 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin |