API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewGLM Latest vs Muse Spark 1.2

Pick Muse Spark 1.2 when budget is the priority.

Page updated: 2026-08-19T15:08:00Z Data confirmed: 2026-08-23T12:07:48Z Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Muse Spark 1.2 when budget is the priority.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Muse Spark 1.2 is estimated at $3.38 vs $3.6 for GLM Latest, saving $0.23 (6.3% lower).

Cost-first pickMuse Spark 1.2

Context-first pickBoth models

Sample savings$0.236.3%

10x traffic gap$2.25

The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $2.25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Muse Spark 1.2 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shape	Token mix	Better pick	GLM Latest	Muse Spark 1.2
Input-heavy / RAG	5M input + 500K output	Muse Spark 1.2	$9.2	$8.38
Balanced workload	1M input + 1M output	Muse Spark 1.2	$5.8	$5.5
Output-heavy chatbot	1M input + 5M output	Muse Spark 1.2	$23.4	$22.5

Cheaper input Muse Spark 1.2 $1.4 vs $1.25 / 1M

Muse Spark 1.2 is $0.15 cheaper per 1M input tokens (10.7% lower; 1.12x difference).

Cheaper output Muse Spark 1.2 $4.4 vs $4.25 / 1M

Muse Spark 1.2 is $0.15 cheaper per 1M output tokens (3.4% lower; 1.04x difference).

Larger context Tie 1.05M vs 1.05M

Both models report the same context window at 1.05M tokens.

Sample workload Muse Spark 1.2 $3.6 vs $3.38

Muse Spark 1.2 is $0.23 cheaper on the standard workload (6.3% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.

Monthly input tokens Monthly output tokens

GLM Latest Calculating… Estimated API cost

Muse Spark 1.2 Calculating… Estimated API cost

Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Muse Spark 1.2 has the lower input price; Muse Spark 1.2 has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $3.6 for GLM Latest and $3.38 for Muse Spark 1.2.

Best Fit

Choose GLM Latest when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.

Choose Muse Spark 1.2 when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Decision Notes

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Muse Spark 1.2 is estimated at $3.38 vs $3.6 for GLM Latest, saving $0.23 (6.3% lower).
Muse Spark 1.2 is $0.23 cheaper on the standard workload (6.3% lower).
Muse Spark 1.2 is $0.15 cheaper per 1M input tokens (10.7% lower; 1.12x difference).
Muse Spark 1.2 is $0.15 cheaper per 1M output tokens (3.4% lower; 1.04x difference).
Both models report the same context window at 1.05M tokens.

Head-to-Head Specs

Feature	NewGLM Latest (Z.ai)	Muse Spark 1.2 (Meta)
Input Price prompt tokens per 1M	$1.4	$1.25
Completion Price per 1M tokens	$4.4	$4.25
Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output	$3.6	$3.38
Context Window	1.05M	1.05M
Release Date	2026-08-19	2026-08-05

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use case	Better pick	Why
Budget-constrained production	Muse Spark 1.2	On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Muse Spark 1.2 is estimated at $3.38 vs $3.6 for GLM Latest, saving $0.23 (6.3% lower).
High-volume input processing	Muse Spark 1.2	Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbots	Muse Spark 1.2	Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document work	Tie	A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps

GLM 5.2 (free) can replace GLM Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
GLM 4.5 Air (free) can replace GLM Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
GLM 4 32B can replace GLM Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
GLM 4.7 Flash can replace GLM Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.26.

Larger context near this budget

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.17 sample workload cost.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.11 sample workload cost.

Popular competitors

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
Hy3 · Tencent · #3
Ox Alpha · stealth · #4

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Z.ai catalog

Review all tracked Z.ai models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Z.ai models

Meta catalog

Check other Meta models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Meta models

GLM Latest

This model always redirects to the latest GLM model from Z.ai.

Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is a reasoning model from Meta, designed for complex agentic tasks. It accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents, returns text, and offers a 1M-token context...