Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest is $0.4 cheaper per 1M input tokens (28.6% lower; 1.4x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewGLM Latest vs Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest
Pick Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest for lower cost; pick GLM Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest for lower cost; pick GLM Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest is estimated at $3.5 vs $3.6 for GLM Latest, saving $0.1 (2.8% lower).
Cost-first pickAnthropic Claude Haiku Latest
Context-first pickGLM Latest
Sample savings$0.12.8%
10x traffic gap$1
GLM Latest has more context, but Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest saves $0.1 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $1. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest, balanced workload favors GLM Latest, and output-heavy chatbot favors GLM Latest.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GLM Latest | Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest | $9.2 | $7.5 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | GLM Latest | $5.8 | $6 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | GLM Latest | $23.4 | $26 |
GLM Latest is $0.6 cheaper per 1M output tokens (12% lower; 1.14x difference).
GLM Latest has 848.58K more context (5.24x larger).
Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest is $0.1 cheaper on the standard workload (2.8% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest has the lower input price; GLM Latest has the lower output price; GLM Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $3.6 for GLM Latest and $3.5 for Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest.
Choose GLM Latest when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest when you care most about lower input-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest is estimated at $3.5 vs $3.6 for GLM Latest, saving $0.1 (2.8% lower).
- Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest is $0.1 cheaper on the standard workload (2.8% lower).
- Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest is $0.4 cheaper per 1M input tokens (28.6% lower; 1.4x difference).
- GLM Latest is $0.6 cheaper per 1M output tokens (12% lower; 1.14x difference).
- GLM Latest has 848.58K more context (5.24x larger).
| Feature | NewGLM Latest (Z.ai) | Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $1.4 | $1 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $4.4 | $5 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $3.6 | $3.5 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 200K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest is estimated at $3.5 vs $3.6 for GLM Latest, saving $0.1 (2.8% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | GLM Latest | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GLM Latest | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- GLM 5.2 (free) can replace GLM Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- GLM 4.5 Air (free) can replace GLM Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- GLM 4 32B can replace GLM Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
- GLM 4.7 Flash can replace GLM Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.26.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.17 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.11 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
- Hy3 · Tencent · #3
- Ox Alpha · stealth · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsZ.ai catalog
Review all tracked Z.ai models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Z.ai modelsAnthropic catalog
Check other Anthropic models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Anthropic modelsThis model always redirects to the latest GLM model from Z.ai.
This model always redirects to the latest model in the Anthropic Claude Haiku family.