API cost decision in 10 seconds

GLM 5V Turbo vs Relace Search

Pick Relace Search when budget and context both matter.

Pricing data updated: 2026-05-26T11:08:00Z Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Relace Search when budget and context both matter.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Relace Search is estimated at $2.5 vs $3.2 for GLM 5V Turbo, saving $0.7 (21.9% lower).

Cost-first pickRelace Search

Context-first pickRelace Search

Sample savings$0.721.9%

10x traffic gap$7

Relace Search is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $7. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Relace Search stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shape	Token mix	Better pick	GLM 5V Turbo	Relace Search
Input-heavy / RAG	5M input + 500K output	Relace Search	$8	$6.5
Balanced workload	1M input + 1M output	Relace Search	$5.2	$4
Output-heavy chatbot	1M input + 5M output	Relace Search	$21.2	$16

Cheaper input Relace Search $1.2 vs $1 / 1M

Relace Search is $0.2 cheaper per 1M input tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).

Cheaper output Relace Search $4 vs $3 / 1M

Relace Search is $1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (25% lower; 1.33x difference).

Larger context Relace Search 202.75K vs 256K

Relace Search has 53.25K more context (1.26x larger).

Sample workload Relace Search $3.2 vs $2.5

Relace Search is $0.7 cheaper on the standard workload (21.9% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.

Monthly input tokens Monthly output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo Calculating… Estimated API cost

Relace Search Calculating… Estimated API cost

Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Relace Search has the lower input price; Relace Search has the lower output price; Relace Search offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Relace Search is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $3.2 for GLM 5V Turbo and $2.5 for Relace Search.

Best Fit

Choose GLM 5V Turbo when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.

Choose Relace Search when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.

Decision Notes

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Relace Search is estimated at $2.5 vs $3.2 for GLM 5V Turbo, saving $0.7 (21.9% lower).
Relace Search is $0.7 cheaper on the standard workload (21.9% lower).
Relace Search is $0.2 cheaper per 1M input tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).
Relace Search is $1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (25% lower; 1.33x difference).
Relace Search has 53.25K more context (1.26x larger).

Head-to-Head Specs

Feature	GLM 5V Turbo (Z.ai)	Relace Search (Relace)
Input Price prompt tokens per 1M	$1.2	$1
Completion Price per 1M tokens	$4	$3
Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output	$3.2	$2.5
Context Window	202.75K	256K
Release Date	2026-04-01	2025-12-08

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use case	Better pick	Why
Budget-constrained production	Relace Search	On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Relace Search is estimated at $2.5 vs $3.2 for GLM 5V Turbo, saving $0.7 (21.9% lower).
High-volume input processing	Relace Search	Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbots	Relace Search	Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document work	Relace Search	A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps

GLM 4.5 Air (free) can replace GLM 5V Turbo when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
GLM 4 32B can replace GLM 5V Turbo when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
GLM 4.7 Flash can replace GLM 5V Turbo when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.26.
GLM 4.5 Air can replace GLM 5V Turbo when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.55.

Larger context near this budget

Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite offers 1.05M context with $1 sample workload cost.

Popular competitors

No popular competitor is currently available.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Z.ai catalog

Review all tracked Z.ai models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Z.ai models

Relace catalog

Check other Relace models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Relace models

GLM 5V Turbo

GLM-5V-Turbo is Z.ai’s first native multimodal agent foundation model, built for vision-based coding and agent-driven tasks. It natively handles image, video, and text inputs, excels at long-horizon planning, complex coding,...

Relace Search

The relace-search model uses 4-12 `view_file` and `grep` tools in parallel to explore a codebase and return relevant files to the user request. In contrast to RAG, relace-search performs agentic...