API cost decision in 10 seconds

GLM 5V Turbo vs NewMistral Medium 3.5

Pick GLM 5V Turbo for lower cost; pick Mistral Medium 3.5 only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick GLM 5V Turbo for lower cost; pick Mistral Medium 3.5 only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 5V Turbo is estimated at $3.2 vs $5.25 for Mistral Medium 3.5, saving $2.05 (39% lower).

Cost-first pickGLM 5V Turbo
Context-first pickMistral Medium 3.5
Sample savings$2.0539%
10x traffic gap$20.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 has more context, but GLM 5V Turbo saves $2.05 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $20.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

GLM 5V Turbo stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickGLM 5V TurboMistral Medium 3.5
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputGLM 5V Turbo$8$11.25
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputGLM 5V Turbo$5.2$9
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputGLM 5V Turbo$21.2$39
Cheaper input GLM 5V Turbo $1.2 vs $1.5 / 1M

GLM 5V Turbo is $0.3 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).

Cheaper output GLM 5V Turbo $4 vs $7.5 / 1M

GLM 5V Turbo is $3.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (46.7% lower; 1.88x difference).

Larger context Mistral Medium 3.5 202.75K vs 262.14K

Mistral Medium 3.5 has 59.39K more context (1.29x larger).

Sample workload GLM 5V Turbo $3.2 vs $5.25

GLM 5V Turbo is $2.05 cheaper on the standard workload (39% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
GLM 5V Turbo Calculating… Estimated API cost
Mistral Medium 3.5 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

GLM 5V Turbo has the lower input price; GLM 5V Turbo has the lower output price; Mistral Medium 3.5 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GLM 5V Turbo is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $3.2 for GLM 5V Turbo and $5.25 for Mistral Medium 3.5.

Best Fit

Choose GLM 5V Turbo when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when you care most about larger context window.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 5V Turbo is estimated at $3.2 vs $5.25 for Mistral Medium 3.5, saving $2.05 (39% lower).
  • GLM 5V Turbo is $2.05 cheaper on the standard workload (39% lower).
  • GLM 5V Turbo is $0.3 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
  • GLM 5V Turbo is $3.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (46.7% lower; 1.88x difference).
  • Mistral Medium 3.5 has 59.39K more context (1.29x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureGLM 5V Turbo
(Z.ai)
NewMistral Medium 3.5
(Mistral)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$1.2$1.5
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$4$7.5
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$3.2$5.25
Context Window202.75K262.14K
Release Date
Popularity#63#125

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionGLM 5V TurboOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 5V Turbo is estimated at $3.2 vs $5.25 for Mistral Medium 3.5, saving $2.05 (39% lower).
High-volume input processingGLM 5V TurboLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsGLM 5V TurboLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workMistral Medium 3.5A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • GLM 4.5 Air (free) can replace GLM 5V Turbo when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • GLM 4 32B can replace GLM 5V Turbo when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
  • GLM 4.7 Flash can replace GLM 5V Turbo when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.26.
  • GLM 4.5 Air can replace GLM 5V Turbo when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.54.
Larger context near this budget

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Z.ai catalog

Review all tracked Z.ai models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Z.ai models

Mistral catalog

Check other Mistral models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Mistral models
GLM 5V Turbo

GLM-5V-Turbo is Z.ai’s first native multimodal agent foundation model, built for vision-based coding and agent-driven tasks. It natively handles image, video, and text inputs, excels at long-horizon planning, complex coding,...

Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 is a dense 128B instruction-following model from Mistral AI. It supports text and image inputs with text output, and is designed for agentic workflows, coding, and complex...