Qwen3.5-27B is $1 cheaper per 1M input tokens (83.7% lower; 6.15x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
GLM 5 Turbo vs Qwen3.5-27B
Pick Qwen3.5-27B when budget and context both matter.
Budget verdict
Pick Qwen3.5-27B when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.5-27B is estimated at $0.98 vs $3.2 for GLM 5 Turbo, saving $2.23 (69.5% lower).
Qwen3.5-27B is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $22.25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Qwen3.5-27B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GLM 5 Turbo | Qwen3.5-27B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Qwen3.5-27B | $8 | $1.75 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Qwen3.5-27B | $5.2 | $1.76 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Qwen3.5-27B | $21.2 | $8 |
Qwen3.5-27B is $2.44 cheaper per 1M output tokens (61% lower; 2.56x difference).
Qwen3.5-27B has 59.39K more context (1.29x larger).
Qwen3.5-27B is $2.23 cheaper on the standard workload (69.5% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Qwen3.5-27B has the lower input price; Qwen3.5-27B has the lower output price; Qwen3.5-27B offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Qwen3.5-27B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $3.2 for GLM 5 Turbo and $0.98 for Qwen3.5-27B.
Choose GLM 5 Turbo when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
Choose Qwen3.5-27B when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.5-27B is estimated at $0.98 vs $3.2 for GLM 5 Turbo, saving $2.23 (69.5% lower).
- Qwen3.5-27B is $2.23 cheaper on the standard workload (69.5% lower).
- Qwen3.5-27B is $1 cheaper per 1M input tokens (83.7% lower; 6.15x difference).
- Qwen3.5-27B is $2.44 cheaper per 1M output tokens (61% lower; 2.56x difference).
- Qwen3.5-27B has 59.39K more context (1.29x larger).
| Feature | GLM 5 Turbo (Z.ai) | Qwen3.5-27B (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $1.2 | $0.195 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $4 | $1.56 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $3.2 | $0.98 |
| Context Window | 202.75K | 262.14K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Qwen3.5-27B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.5-27B is estimated at $0.98 vs $3.2 for GLM 5 Turbo, saving $2.23 (69.5% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Qwen3.5-27B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Qwen3.5-27B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Qwen3.5-27B | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- GLM 4.5 Air (free) can replace GLM 5 Turbo when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- GLM 4 32B can replace GLM 5 Turbo when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
- GLM 4.7 Flash can replace GLM 5 Turbo when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.26.
- GLM 4.5 Air can replace GLM 5 Turbo when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.55.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite offers 1.05M context with $1 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsZ.ai catalog
Review all tracked Z.ai models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Z.ai modelsQwen catalog
Check other Qwen models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Qwen modelsGLM-5 Turbo is a new model from Z.ai designed for fast inference and strong performance in agent-driven environments such as OpenClaw scenarios. It is deeply optimized for real-world agent workflows...
The Qwen3.5 27B native vision-language Dense model incorporates a linear attention mechanism, delivering fast response times while balancing inference speed and performance. Its overall capabilities are comparable to those of...