API cost decision in 10 seconds

GLM 5 Turbo vs GPT-5.2-Codex

Pick GLM 5 Turbo for lower cost; pick GPT-5.2-Codex only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick GLM 5 Turbo for lower cost; pick GPT-5.2-Codex only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 5 Turbo is estimated at $3.2 vs $8.75 for GPT-5.2-Codex, saving $5.55 (63.4% lower).

Cost-first pickGLM 5 Turbo
Context-first pickGPT-5.2-Codex
Sample savings$5.5563.4%
10x traffic gap$55.5

GPT-5.2-Codex has more context, but GLM 5 Turbo saves $5.55 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $55.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

GLM 5 Turbo stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickGLM 5 TurboGPT-5.2-Codex
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputGLM 5 Turbo$8$15.75
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputGLM 5 Turbo$5.2$15.75
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputGLM 5 Turbo$21.2$71.75
Cheaper input GLM 5 Turbo $1.2 vs $1.75 / 1M

GLM 5 Turbo is $0.55 cheaper per 1M input tokens (31.4% lower; 1.46x difference).

Cheaper output GLM 5 Turbo $4 vs $14 / 1M

GLM 5 Turbo is $10 cheaper per 1M output tokens (71.4% lower; 3.5x difference).

Larger context GPT-5.2-Codex 202.75K vs 400K

GPT-5.2-Codex has 197.25K more context (1.97x larger).

Sample workload GLM 5 Turbo $3.2 vs $8.75

GLM 5 Turbo is $5.55 cheaper on the standard workload (63.4% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
GLM 5 Turbo Calculating… Estimated API cost
GPT-5.2-Codex Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

GLM 5 Turbo has the lower input price; GLM 5 Turbo has the lower output price; GPT-5.2-Codex offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GLM 5 Turbo is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $3.2 for GLM 5 Turbo and $8.75 for GPT-5.2-Codex.

Best Fit

Choose GLM 5 Turbo when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Choose GPT-5.2-Codex when you care most about larger context window.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 5 Turbo is estimated at $3.2 vs $8.75 for GPT-5.2-Codex, saving $5.55 (63.4% lower).
  • GLM 5 Turbo is $5.55 cheaper on the standard workload (63.4% lower).
  • GLM 5 Turbo is $0.55 cheaper per 1M input tokens (31.4% lower; 1.46x difference).
  • GLM 5 Turbo is $10 cheaper per 1M output tokens (71.4% lower; 3.5x difference).
  • GPT-5.2-Codex has 197.25K more context (1.97x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureGLM 5 Turbo
(Z.ai)		GPT-5.2-Codex
(OpenAI)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M		$1.2$1.75
Completion Price
per 1M tokens		$4$14
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output		$3.2$8.75
Context Window202.75K400K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionGLM 5 TurboOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 5 Turbo is estimated at $3.2 vs $8.75 for GPT-5.2-Codex, saving $5.55 (63.4% lower).
High-volume input processingGLM 5 TurboLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsGLM 5 TurboLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workGPT-5.2-CodexA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • GLM 4.5 Air (free) can replace GLM 5 Turbo when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • GLM 4 32B can replace GLM 5 Turbo when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
  • GLM 4.7 Flash can replace GLM 5 Turbo when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.26.
  • GLM 4.5 Air can replace GLM 5 Turbo when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.55.
Larger context near this budget
  • Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
  • Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-5.4 offers 1.05M context with $10 sample workload cost.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Z.ai catalog

Review all tracked Z.ai models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Z.ai models

OpenAI catalog

Check other OpenAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open OpenAI models
GLM 5 Turbo

GLM-5 Turbo is a new model from Z.ai designed for fast inference and strong performance in agent-driven environments such as OpenClaw scenarios. It is deeply optimized for real-world agent workflows...

GPT-5.2-Codex

GPT-5.2-Codex is an upgraded version of GPT-5.1-Codex optimized for software engineering and coding workflows. It is designed for both interactive development sessions and long, independent execution of complex engineering tasks....