Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) is free for input tokens while GLM 5.2 costs $0.97 per 1M tokens.
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥GLM 5.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)
Pick Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) for lower cost; pick GLM 5.2 only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) for lower cost; pick GLM 5.2 only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) is estimated at $0 vs $2.48 for GLM 5.2, saving $2.48 (100% lower).
Cost-first pickNemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)
Context-first pickGLM 5.2
Sample savings$2.48100%
10x traffic gap$24.84
GLM 5.2 has more context, but Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) saves $2.48 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $24.84. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GLM 5.2 | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) | $6.35 | $0 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) | $4 | $0 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) | $16.15 | $0 |
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) is free for output tokens while GLM 5.2 costs $3.04 per 1M tokens.
GLM 5.2 has 920.58K more context (8.19x larger).
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $2.48.
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) has the lower input price; Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) has the lower output price; GLM 5.2 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $2.48 for GLM 5.2 and $0 for Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free).
Choose GLM 5.2 when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) is estimated at $0 vs $2.48 for GLM 5.2, saving $2.48 (100% lower).
- Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $2.48.
- Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) is free for input tokens while GLM 5.2 costs $0.97 per 1M tokens.
- Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) is free for output tokens while GLM 5.2 costs $3.04 per 1M tokens.
- GLM 5.2 has 920.58K more context (8.19x larger).
| Feature | 🔥GLM 5.2 (Z.ai) | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) (NVIDIA) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.966 | $0 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $3.036 | $0 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $2.48 | $0 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 128K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #8 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) is estimated at $0 vs $2.48 for GLM 5.2, saving $2.48 (100% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GLM 5.2 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- GLM 5.2 (free) can replace GLM 5.2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- GLM 4.5 Air (free) can replace GLM 5.2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- GLM 4 32B can replace GLM 5.2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
- GLM 4.7 Flash can replace GLM 5.2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.26.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.17 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.11 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
- Hy3 · Tencent · #3
- Ox Alpha · stealth · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsZ.ai catalog
Review all tracked Z.ai models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Z.ai modelsNVIDIA catalog
Check other NVIDIA models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open NVIDIA modelsGLM 5.2 is a large-scale reasoning model from Z.ai. It supports text input and output with a 1M-token context window, and is suited for long-horizon agent workflows, project-level software engineering,...
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is a compact 4B-parameter multimodal guardrail model from NVIDIA, fine-tuned from Google Gemma-3-4B. It moderates both inputs to and responses from LLMs and VLMs, accepting...