API cost decision in 10 seconds

GLM 5.1 vs Qwen3 Max Thinking

Pick GLM 5.1 for lower cost; pick Qwen3 Max Thinking only if the larger context window matters more.

Pricing data updated:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick GLM 5.1 for lower cost; pick Qwen3 Max Thinking only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 5.1 is estimated at $2.52 vs $2.73 for Qwen3 Max Thinking, saving $0.21 (7.7% lower).

Cost-first pickGLM 5.1
Context-first pickQwen3 Max Thinking
Sample savings$0.217.7%
10x traffic gap$2.1

Qwen3 Max Thinking has more context, but GLM 5.1 saves $0.21 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $2.1. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Qwen3 Max Thinking, balanced workload favors GLM 5.1, and output-heavy chatbot favors GLM 5.1.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickGLM 5.1Qwen3 Max Thinking
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputQwen3 Max Thinking$6.44$5.85
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputGLM 5.1$4.06$4.68
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputGLM 5.1$16.38$20.28
Cheaper input Qwen3 Max Thinking $0.98 vs $0.78 / 1M

Qwen3 Max Thinking is $0.2 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20.4% lower; 1.26x difference).

Cheaper output GLM 5.1 $3.08 vs $3.9 / 1M

GLM 5.1 is $0.82 cheaper per 1M output tokens (21% lower; 1.27x difference).

Larger context Qwen3 Max Thinking 202.75K vs 262.14K

Qwen3 Max Thinking has 59.39K more context (1.29x larger).

Sample workload GLM 5.1 $2.52 vs $2.73

GLM 5.1 is $0.21 cheaper on the standard workload (7.7% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
GLM 5.1 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Qwen3 Max Thinking Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Qwen3 Max Thinking has the lower input price; GLM 5.1 has the lower output price; Qwen3 Max Thinking offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GLM 5.1 is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $2.52 for GLM 5.1 and $2.73 for Qwen3 Max Thinking.

Best Fit

Choose GLM 5.1 when you care most about lower output-token price.

Choose Qwen3 Max Thinking when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 5.1 is estimated at $2.52 vs $2.73 for Qwen3 Max Thinking, saving $0.21 (7.7% lower).
  • GLM 5.1 is $0.21 cheaper on the standard workload (7.7% lower).
  • Qwen3 Max Thinking is $0.2 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20.4% lower; 1.26x difference).
  • GLM 5.1 is $0.82 cheaper per 1M output tokens (21% lower; 1.27x difference).
  • Qwen3 Max Thinking has 59.39K more context (1.29x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureGLM 5.1
(Z.ai)
Qwen3 Max Thinking
(Qwen)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$0.98$0.78
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$3.08$3.9
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$2.52$2.73
Context Window202.75K262.14K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionGLM 5.1On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 5.1 is estimated at $2.52 vs $2.73 for Qwen3 Max Thinking, saving $0.21 (7.7% lower).
High-volume input processingQwen3 Max ThinkingLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsGLM 5.1Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workQwen3 Max ThinkingA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • GLM 4.5 Air (free) can replace GLM 5.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • GLM 4 32B can replace GLM 5.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
  • GLM 4.7 Flash can replace GLM 5.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.26.
  • GLM 4.5 Air can replace GLM 5.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.55.
Larger context near this budget
Popular competitors
  • No popular competitor is currently available.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Z.ai catalog

Review all tracked Z.ai models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Z.ai models

Qwen catalog

Check other Qwen models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Qwen models
GLM 5.1

GLM-5.1 delivers a major leap in coding capability, with particularly significant gains in handling long-horizon tasks. Unlike previous models built around minute-level interactions, GLM-5.1 can work independently and continuously on...

Qwen3 Max Thinking

Qwen3-Max-Thinking is the flagship reasoning model in the Qwen3 series, designed for high-stakes cognitive tasks that require deep, multi-step reasoning. By significantly scaling model capacity and reinforcement learning compute, it...