Mistral Large 3 2512 is $0.48 cheaper per 1M input tokens (49% lower; 1.96x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
GLM 5.1 vs Mistral Large 3 2512
Pick Mistral Large 3 2512 when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Mistral Large 3 2512 when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Large 3 2512 is estimated at $1.25 vs $2.52 for GLM 5.1, saving $1.27 (50.4% lower).
Cost-first pickMistral Large 3 2512
Context-first pickMistral Large 3 2512
Sample savings$1.2750.4%
10x traffic gap$12.7
Mistral Large 3 2512 is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $12.7. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Mistral Large 3 2512 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GLM 5.1 | Mistral Large 3 2512 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Mistral Large 3 2512 | $6.44 | $3.25 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Mistral Large 3 2512 | $4.06 | $2 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Mistral Large 3 2512 | $16.38 | $8 |
Mistral Large 3 2512 is $1.58 cheaper per 1M output tokens (51.3% lower; 2.05x difference).
Mistral Large 3 2512 has 59.39K more context (1.29x larger).
Mistral Large 3 2512 is $1.27 cheaper on the standard workload (50.4% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Mistral Large 3 2512 has the lower input price; Mistral Large 3 2512 has the lower output price; Mistral Large 3 2512 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Mistral Large 3 2512 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $2.52 for GLM 5.1 and $1.25 for Mistral Large 3 2512.
Choose GLM 5.1 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
Choose Mistral Large 3 2512 when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Large 3 2512 is estimated at $1.25 vs $2.52 for GLM 5.1, saving $1.27 (50.4% lower).
- Mistral Large 3 2512 is $1.27 cheaper on the standard workload (50.4% lower).
- Mistral Large 3 2512 is $0.48 cheaper per 1M input tokens (49% lower; 1.96x difference).
- Mistral Large 3 2512 is $1.58 cheaper per 1M output tokens (51.3% lower; 2.05x difference).
- Mistral Large 3 2512 has 59.39K more context (1.29x larger).
| Feature | GLM 5.1 (Z.ai) | Mistral Large 3 2512 (Mistral) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.98 | $0.5 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $3.08 | $1.5 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $2.52 | $1.25 |
| Context Window | 202.75K | 262.14K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Mistral Large 3 2512 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Large 3 2512 is estimated at $1.25 vs $2.52 for GLM 5.1, saving $1.27 (50.4% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Mistral Large 3 2512 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Mistral Large 3 2512 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Mistral Large 3 2512 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- GLM 4.5 Air (free) can replace GLM 5.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- GLM 4 32B can replace GLM 5.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
- GLM 4.7 Flash can replace GLM 5.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.26.
- GLM 4.5 Air can replace GLM 5.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.55.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsZ.ai catalog
Review all tracked Z.ai models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Z.ai modelsMistral catalog
Check other Mistral models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Mistral modelsGLM-5.1 delivers a major leap in coding capability, with particularly significant gains in handling long-horizon tasks. Unlike previous models built around minute-level interactions, GLM-5.1 can work independently and continuously on...
Mistral Large 3 2512 is Mistral’s most capable model to date, featuring a sparse mixture-of-experts architecture with 41B active parameters (675B total), and released under the Apache 2.0 license.