GLM 5.1 is $1.02 cheaper per 1M input tokens (51% lower; 2.04x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥GLM 5.1 vs 🔥Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Pick GLM 5.1 for lower cost; pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only if the larger context window matters more.
Budget verdict
Pick GLM 5.1 for lower cost; pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 5.1 is estimated at $2.52 vs $8 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, saving $5.48 (68.5% lower).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has more context, but GLM 5.1 saves $5.48 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $54.8. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
GLM 5.1 is $8.92 cheaper per 1M output tokens (74.3% lower; 3.9x difference).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 845.82K more context (5.17x larger).
GLM 5.1 is $5.48 cheaper on the standard workload (68.5% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
GLM 5.1 has the lower input price; GLM 5.1 has the lower output price; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GLM 5.1 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $2.52 for GLM 5.1 and $8 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
Choose GLM 5.1 when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you care most about larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 5.1 is estimated at $2.52 vs $8 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, saving $5.48 (68.5% lower).
- GLM 5.1 is $5.48 cheaper on the standard workload (68.5% lower).
- GLM 5.1 is $1.02 cheaper per 1M input tokens (51% lower; 2.04x difference).
- GLM 5.1 is $8.92 cheaper per 1M output tokens (74.3% lower; 3.9x difference).
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 845.82K more context (5.17x larger).
| Feature | 🔥GLM 5.1 (Z.ai) | 🔥Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.98 | $2 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $3.08 | $12 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $2.52 | $8 |
| Context Window | 202.75K | 1.05M |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity Rank current rank | #13 | #20 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | GLM 5.1 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 5.1 is estimated at $2.52 vs $8 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, saving $5.48 (68.5% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | GLM 5.1 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | GLM 5.1 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- GLM 4.5 Air (free) can replace GLM 5.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- GLM 4 32B can replace GLM 5.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
- GLM 4.7 Flash can replace GLM 5.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.26.
- GLM 4.5 Air can replace GLM 5.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.55.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- GPT-5.4 offers 1.05M context with $10 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models ranked by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsZ.ai catalog
Review all tracked Z.ai models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Z.ai modelsGoogle catalog
Check other Google models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Google modelsGLM-5.1 delivers a major leap in coding capability, with particularly significant gains in handling long-horizon tasks. Unlike previous models built around minute-level interactions, GLM-5.1 can work independently and continuously on...
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is Google’s frontier reasoning model, delivering enhanced software engineering performance, improved agentic reliability, and more efficient token usage across complex workflows. Building on the multimodal foundation...