Llama 3 8B Lunaris is $0.02 cheaper per 1M input tokens (33.3% lower; 1.5x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
GLM 4.7 Flash vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Pick Llama 3 8B Lunaris for lower cost; pick GLM 4.7 Flash only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Llama 3 8B Lunaris for lower cost; pick GLM 4.7 Flash only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Llama 3 8B Lunaris is estimated at $0.07 vs $0.26 for GLM 4.7 Flash, saving $0.2 (75% lower).
Cost-first pickLlama 3 8B Lunaris
Context-first pickGLM 4.7 Flash
Sample savings$0.275%
10x traffic gap$1.95
GLM 4.7 Flash has more context, but Llama 3 8B Lunaris saves $0.2 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $1.95. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Llama 3 8B Lunaris stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GLM 4.7 Flash | Llama 3 8B Lunaris |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Llama 3 8B Lunaris | $0.5 | $0.23 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Llama 3 8B Lunaris | $0.46 | $0.09 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Llama 3 8B Lunaris | $2.06 | $0.29 |
Llama 3 8B Lunaris is $0.35 cheaper per 1M output tokens (87.5% lower; 8x difference).
GLM 4.7 Flash has 194.56K more context (24.8x larger).
Llama 3 8B Lunaris is $0.2 cheaper on the standard workload (75% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Llama 3 8B Lunaris has the lower input price; Llama 3 8B Lunaris has the lower output price; GLM 4.7 Flash offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Llama 3 8B Lunaris is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.26 for GLM 4.7 Flash and $0.07 for Llama 3 8B Lunaris.
Choose GLM 4.7 Flash when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Llama 3 8B Lunaris when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Llama 3 8B Lunaris is estimated at $0.07 vs $0.26 for GLM 4.7 Flash, saving $0.2 (75% lower).
- Llama 3 8B Lunaris is $0.2 cheaper on the standard workload (75% lower).
- Llama 3 8B Lunaris is $0.02 cheaper per 1M input tokens (33.3% lower; 1.5x difference).
- Llama 3 8B Lunaris is $0.35 cheaper per 1M output tokens (87.5% lower; 8x difference).
- GLM 4.7 Flash has 194.56K more context (24.8x larger).
| Feature | GLM 4.7 Flash (Z.ai) | Llama 3 8B Lunaris (Sao10K) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.06 | $0.04 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.4 | $0.05 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.26 | $0.07 |
| Context Window | 202.75K | 8.19K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #58 | #115 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Llama 3 8B Lunaris | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Llama 3 8B Lunaris is estimated at $0.07 vs $0.26 for GLM 4.7 Flash, saving $0.2 (75% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Llama 3 8B Lunaris | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Llama 3 8B Lunaris | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GLM 4.7 Flash | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- GLM 4.5 Air (free) can replace GLM 4.7 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- GLM 4 32B can replace GLM 4.7 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite offers 1.05M context with $0.3 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsZ.ai catalog
Review all tracked Z.ai models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Z.ai modelsSao10K catalog
Check other Sao10K models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Sao10K modelsAs a 30B-class SOTA model, GLM-4.7-Flash offers a new option that balances performance and efficiency. It is further optimized for agentic coding use cases, strengthening coding capabilities, long-horizon task planning,...
Lunaris 8B is a versatile generalist and roleplaying model based on Llama 3. It's a strategic merge of multiple models, designed to balance creativity with improved logic and general knowledge....