API cost decision in 10 seconds

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507

Pick Voxtral Small 24B 2507 for lower cost; pick GLM 4.7 Flash only if the larger context window matters more.

Pricing data updated:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Voxtral Small 24B 2507 for lower cost; pick GLM 4.7 Flash only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is estimated at $0.25 vs $0.26 for GLM 4.7 Flash, saving $0.01 (3.8% lower).

Cost-first pickVoxtral Small 24B 2507
Context-first pickGLM 4.7 Flash
Sample savings$0.013.8%
10x traffic gap$0.1

GLM 4.7 Flash has more context, but Voxtral Small 24B 2507 saves $0.01 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.1. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors GLM 4.7 Flash, balanced workload favors Voxtral Small 24B 2507, and output-heavy chatbot favors Voxtral Small 24B 2507.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickGLM 4.7 FlashVoxtral Small 24B 2507
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputGLM 4.7 Flash$0.5$0.65
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputVoxtral Small 24B 2507$0.46$0.4
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputVoxtral Small 24B 2507$2.06$1.6
Cheaper input GLM 4.7 Flash $0.06 vs $0.1 / 1M

GLM 4.7 Flash is $0.04 cheaper per 1M input tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).

Cheaper output Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.4 vs $0.3 / 1M

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is $0.1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (25% lower; 1.33x difference).

Larger context GLM 4.7 Flash 202.75K vs 32K

GLM 4.7 Flash has 170.75K more context (6.34x larger).

Sample workload Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.26 vs $0.25

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is $0.01 cheaper on the standard workload (3.8% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
GLM 4.7 Flash Calculating… Estimated API cost
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

GLM 4.7 Flash has the lower input price; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has the lower output price; GLM 4.7 Flash offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.26 for GLM 4.7 Flash and $0.25 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507.

Best Fit

Choose GLM 4.7 Flash when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.

Choose Voxtral Small 24B 2507 when you care most about lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is estimated at $0.25 vs $0.26 for GLM 4.7 Flash, saving $0.01 (3.8% lower).
  • Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is $0.01 cheaper on the standard workload (3.8% lower).
  • GLM 4.7 Flash is $0.04 cheaper per 1M input tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).
  • Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is $0.1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (25% lower; 1.33x difference).
  • GLM 4.7 Flash has 170.75K more context (6.34x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureGLM 4.7 Flash
(Z.ai)		Voxtral Small 24B 2507
(Mistral)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M		$0.06$0.1
Completion Price
per 1M tokens		$0.4$0.3
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output		$0.26$0.25
Context Window202.75K32K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionVoxtral Small 24B 2507On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is estimated at $0.25 vs $0.26 for GLM 4.7 Flash, saving $0.01 (3.8% lower).
High-volume input processingGLM 4.7 FlashLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsVoxtral Small 24B 2507Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workGLM 4.7 FlashA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • GLM 4.5 Air (free) can replace GLM 4.7 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • GLM 4 32B can replace GLM 4.7 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
  • Mistral Nemo can replace Voxtral Small 24B 2507 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.04.
  • Mistral Small 3 can replace Voxtral Small 24B 2507 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
Popular competitors
  • No popular competitor is currently available.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Z.ai catalog

Review all tracked Z.ai models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Z.ai models

Mistral catalog

Check other Mistral models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Mistral models
GLM 4.7 Flash

As a 30B-class SOTA model, GLM-4.7-Flash offers a new option that balances performance and efficiency. It is further optimized for agentic coding use cases, strengthening coding capabilities, long-horizon task planning,...

Voxtral Small 24B 2507

Voxtral Small is an enhancement of Mistral Small 3, incorporating state-of-the-art audio input capabilities while retaining best-in-class text performance. It excels at speech transcription, translation and audio understanding. Input audio...