GLM 4.5 Air is $0.07 cheaper per 1M input tokens (35% lower; 1.54x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
GLM 4.5 Air vs DeepSeek V3 0324
Pick GLM 4.5 Air for lower cost; pick DeepSeek V3 0324 only if the larger context window matters more.
Budget verdict
Pick GLM 4.5 Air for lower cost; pick DeepSeek V3 0324 only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 4.5 Air is estimated at $0.55 vs $0.58 for DeepSeek V3 0324, saving $0.03 (5.1% lower).
DeepSeek V3 0324 has more context, but GLM 4.5 Air saves $0.03 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.3. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors GLM 4.5 Air, balanced workload favors DeepSeek V3 0324, and output-heavy chatbot favors DeepSeek V3 0324.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GLM 4.5 Air | DeepSeek V3 0324 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | GLM 4.5 Air | $1.07 | $1.39 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | DeepSeek V3 0324 | $0.98 | $0.97 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | DeepSeek V3 0324 | $4.38 | $4.05 |
DeepSeek V3 0324 is $0.08 cheaper per 1M output tokens (9.4% lower; 1.1x difference).
DeepSeek V3 0324 has 32.77K more context (1.25x larger).
GLM 4.5 Air is $0.03 cheaper on the standard workload (5.1% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
GLM 4.5 Air has the lower input price; DeepSeek V3 0324 has the lower output price; DeepSeek V3 0324 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GLM 4.5 Air is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.55 for GLM 4.5 Air and $0.58 for DeepSeek V3 0324.
Choose GLM 4.5 Air when you care most about lower input-token price.
Choose DeepSeek V3 0324 when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 4.5 Air is estimated at $0.55 vs $0.58 for DeepSeek V3 0324, saving $0.03 (5.1% lower).
- GLM 4.5 Air is $0.03 cheaper on the standard workload (5.1% lower).
- GLM 4.5 Air is $0.07 cheaper per 1M input tokens (35% lower; 1.54x difference).
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is $0.08 cheaper per 1M output tokens (9.4% lower; 1.1x difference).
- DeepSeek V3 0324 has 32.77K more context (1.25x larger).
| Feature | GLM 4.5 Air (Z.ai) | DeepSeek V3 0324 (DeepSeek) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.13 | $0.2 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.85 | $0.77 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.55 | $0.58 |
| Context Window | 131.07K | 163.84K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #37 | #52 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | GLM 4.5 Air | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 4.5 Air is estimated at $0.55 vs $0.58 for DeepSeek V3 0324, saving $0.03 (5.1% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | GLM 4.5 Air | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | DeepSeek V3 0324 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- GLM 4.5 Air (free) can replace GLM 4.5 Air when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- GLM 4 32B can replace GLM 4.5 Air when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
- GLM 4.7 Flash can replace GLM 4.5 Air when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.26.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) can replace DeepSeek V3 0324 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite offers 1.05M context with $0.3 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsZ.ai catalog
Review all tracked Z.ai models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Z.ai modelsDeepSeek catalog
Check other DeepSeek models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open DeepSeek modelsGLM-4.5-Air is the lightweight variant of our latest flagship model family, also purpose-built for agent-centric applications. Like GLM-4.5, it adopts the Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture but with a more compact parameter...
DeepSeek V3, a 685B-parameter, mixture-of-experts model, is the latest iteration of the flagship chat model family from the DeepSeek team. It succeeds the [DeepSeek V3](/deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3) model and performs really well...