Claude Opus 5 (batch) is $1.85 cheaper per 1M input tokens (42.5% lower; 1.74x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Claude Opus 5 (batch)
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is estimated at $8.7 vs $8.75 for Claude Opus 5 (batch), saving $0.05 (0.6% lower).
Cost-first pickMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
Context-first pickMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
Sample savings$0.050.6%
10x traffic gap$0.5
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Claude Opus 5 (batch), balanced workload favors MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed, and output-heavy chatbot favors MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed | Claude Opus 5 (batch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Claude Opus 5 (batch) | $26.1 | $18.75 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed | $13.05 | $15 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed | $47.85 | $65 |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is $3.8 cheaper per 1M output tokens (30.4% lower; 1.44x difference).
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has 48.58K more context (1.05x larger).
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is $0.05 cheaper on the standard workload (0.6% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Claude Opus 5 (batch) has the lower input price; MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has the lower output price; MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $8.7 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed and $8.75 for Claude Opus 5 (batch).
Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Claude Opus 5 (batch) when you care most about lower input-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is estimated at $8.7 vs $8.75 for Claude Opus 5 (batch), saving $0.05 (0.6% lower).
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is $0.05 cheaper on the standard workload (0.6% lower).
- Claude Opus 5 (batch) is $1.85 cheaper per 1M input tokens (42.5% lower; 1.74x difference).
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is $3.8 cheaper per 1M output tokens (30.4% lower; 1.44x difference).
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has 48.58K more context (1.05x larger).
| Feature | NewMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed (Xiaomi) | Claude Opus 5 (batch) (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $4.35 | $2.5 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $8.7 | $12.5 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $8.7 | $8.75 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is estimated at $8.7 vs $8.75 for Claude Opus 5 (batch), saving $0.05 (0.6% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Claude Opus 5 (batch) | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- MiMo-V2-Flash can replace MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.25.
- MiMo-V2.5 can replace MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.28.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash can replace MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.28.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro can replace MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.87.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- GLM 5.3 Flash offers 1.31M context with $0.4 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.36 sample workload cost.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) · Qwen · #1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #2
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #3
- Hy4 preview · Tencent · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsXiaomi catalog
Review all tracked Xiaomi models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Xiaomi modelsAnthropic catalog
Check other Anthropic models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Anthropic modelsMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is the fast speed edition of Xiaomi's flagship foundation model, MiMo-V2.6-Pro. Built from the same 1T MiMo-V2.6-Pro checkpoint, it matches the original model in quality while delivering roughly 10x...
Claude Opus 5 is Anthropic’s flagship model for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work. It is particularly strong at end-to-end software tasks, code review and bug finding, visual analysis...