Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is $0.26 cheaper per 1M input tokens (65.2% lower; 2.88x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Pick Qwen3.5-35B-A3B for lower cost; pick MiMo-V2.5 only if the larger context window matters more.
Pricing data updated:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Qwen3.5-35B-A3B for lower cost; pick MiMo-V2.5 only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is estimated at $0.64 vs $1.4 for MiMo-V2.5, saving $0.76 (54.4% lower).
Cost-first pickQwen3.5-35B-A3B
Context-first pickMiMo-V2.5
Sample savings$0.7654.4%
10x traffic gap$7.61
MiMo-V2.5 has more context, but Qwen3.5-35B-A3B saves $0.76 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $7.61. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | $3 | $1.2 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | $2.4 | $1.14 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | $10.4 | $5.14 |
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is $1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
MiMo-V2.5 has 786.43K more context (4x larger).
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is $0.76 cheaper on the standard workload (54.4% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has the lower input price; Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has the lower output price; MiMo-V2.5 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.4 for MiMo-V2.5 and $0.64 for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B.
Choose MiMo-V2.5 when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Qwen3.5-35B-A3B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is estimated at $0.64 vs $1.4 for MiMo-V2.5, saving $0.76 (54.4% lower).
- Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is $0.76 cheaper on the standard workload (54.4% lower).
- Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is $0.26 cheaper per 1M input tokens (65.2% lower; 2.88x difference).
- Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is $1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
- MiMo-V2.5 has 786.43K more context (4x larger).
| Feature | MiMo-V2.5 (Xiaomi) | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.4 | $0.139 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $2 | $1 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $1.4 | $0.64 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 262.14K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is estimated at $0.64 vs $1.4 for MiMo-V2.5, saving $0.76 (54.4% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | MiMo-V2.5 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- MiMo-V2-Flash can replace MiMo-V2.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.25.
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (free) can replace Qwen3.5-35B-A3B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (free) can replace Qwen3.5-35B-A3B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct can replace Qwen3.5-35B-A3B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsXiaomi catalog
Review all tracked Xiaomi models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Xiaomi modelsQwen catalog
Check other Qwen models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Qwen modelsMiMo-V2.5 is a native omnimodal model by Xiaomi. It delivers Pro-level agentic performance at roughly half the inference cost, while surpassing MiMo-V2-Omni in multimodal perception across image and video understanding...
The Qwen3.5 Series 35B-A3B is a native vision-language model designed with a hybrid architecture that integrates linear attention mechanisms and a sparse mixture-of-experts model, achieving higher inference efficiency. Its overall...