Phi 4 is $0.08 cheaper per 1M input tokens (53.6% lower; 2.15x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥MiMo-V2.5 vs Phi 4
Pick Phi 4 for lower cost; pick MiMo-V2.5 only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Phi 4 for lower cost; pick MiMo-V2.5 only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Phi 4 is estimated at $0.14 vs $0.28 for MiMo-V2.5, saving $0.15 (51.8% lower).
Cost-first pickPhi 4
Context-first pickMiMo-V2.5
Sample savings$0.1551.8%
10x traffic gap$1.45
MiMo-V2.5 has more context, but Phi 4 saves $0.15 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $1.45. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Phi 4 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Phi 4 | $0.84 | $0.4 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Phi 4 | $0.42 | $0.21 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Phi 4 | $1.54 | $0.77 |
Phi 4 is $0.14 cheaper per 1M output tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
MiMo-V2.5 has 1.03M more context (64x larger).
Phi 4 is $0.15 cheaper on the standard workload (51.8% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Phi 4 has the lower input price; Phi 4 has the lower output price; MiMo-V2.5 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Phi 4 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.28 for MiMo-V2.5 and $0.14 for Phi 4.
Choose MiMo-V2.5 when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Phi 4 when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Phi 4 is estimated at $0.14 vs $0.28 for MiMo-V2.5, saving $0.15 (51.8% lower).
- Phi 4 is $0.15 cheaper on the standard workload (51.8% lower).
- Phi 4 is $0.08 cheaper per 1M input tokens (53.6% lower; 2.15x difference).
- Phi 4 is $0.14 cheaper per 1M output tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
- MiMo-V2.5 has 1.03M more context (64x larger).
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Phi 4 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Phi 4 is estimated at $0.14 vs $0.28 for MiMo-V2.5, saving $0.15 (51.8% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Phi 4 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Phi 4 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | MiMo-V2.5 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- MiMo-V2-Flash can replace MiMo-V2.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.25.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- MiniMax M3 · MiniMax · #4
- DeepSeek V4 Pro · DeepSeek · #5
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsXiaomi catalog
Review all tracked Xiaomi models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Xiaomi modelsMicrosoft catalog
Check other Microsoft models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Microsoft modelsMiMo-V2.5 is a native omnimodal model by Xiaomi. It delivers Pro-level agentic performance at roughly half the inference cost, while surpassing MiMo-V2-Omni in multimodal perception across image and video understanding...
[Microsoft Research](/microsoft) Phi-4 is designed to perform well in complex reasoning tasks and can operate efficiently in situations with limited memory or where quick responses are needed. At 14 billion...