API cost decision in 10 seconds

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs GLM 4.7

Pick GLM 4.7 for lower cost; pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro only if the larger context window matters more.

Pricing data updated:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick GLM 4.7 for lower cost; pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 4.7 is estimated at $1.27 vs $2.5 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro, saving $1.23 (49% lower).

Cost-first pickGLM 4.7
Context-first pickMiMo-V2.5-Pro
Sample savings$1.2349%
10x traffic gap$12.25

MiMo-V2.5-Pro has more context, but GLM 4.7 saves $1.23 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $12.25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

GLM 4.7 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickMiMo-V2.5-ProGLM 4.7
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputGLM 4.7$6.5$2.88
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputGLM 4.7$4$2.15
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputGLM 4.7$16$9.15
Cheaper input GLM 4.7 $1 vs $0.4 / 1M

GLM 4.7 is $0.6 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).

Cheaper output GLM 4.7 $3 vs $1.75 / 1M

GLM 4.7 is $1.25 cheaper per 1M output tokens (41.7% lower; 1.71x difference).

Larger context MiMo-V2.5-Pro 1.05M vs 202.75K

MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 845.82K more context (5.17x larger).

Sample workload GLM 4.7 $2.5 vs $1.27

GLM 4.7 is $1.23 cheaper on the standard workload (49% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro Calculating… Estimated API cost
GLM 4.7 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

GLM 4.7 has the lower input price; GLM 4.7 has the lower output price; MiMo-V2.5-Pro offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GLM 4.7 is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $2.5 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and $1.27 for GLM 4.7.

Best Fit

Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro when you care most about larger context window.

Choose GLM 4.7 when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 4.7 is estimated at $1.27 vs $2.5 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro, saving $1.23 (49% lower).
  • GLM 4.7 is $1.23 cheaper on the standard workload (49% lower).
  • GLM 4.7 is $0.6 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
  • GLM 4.7 is $1.25 cheaper per 1M output tokens (41.7% lower; 1.71x difference).
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 845.82K more context (5.17x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureMiMo-V2.5-Pro
(Xiaomi)
GLM 4.7
(Z.ai)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$1$0.4
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$3$1.75
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$2.5$1.27
Context Window1.05M202.75K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionGLM 4.7On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 4.7 is estimated at $1.27 vs $2.5 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro, saving $1.23 (49% lower).
High-volume input processingGLM 4.7Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsGLM 4.7Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workMiMo-V2.5-ProA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • MiMo-V2-Flash can replace MiMo-V2.5-Pro when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.25.
  • MiMo-V2.5 can replace MiMo-V2.5-Pro when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.4.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni can replace MiMo-V2.5-Pro when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.4.
  • GLM 4.5 Air (free) can replace GLM 4.7 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
Larger context near this budget
  • Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
  • Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
  • Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
Popular competitors
  • No popular competitor is currently available.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Xiaomi catalog

Review all tracked Xiaomi models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Xiaomi models

Z.ai catalog

Check other Z.ai models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Z.ai models
MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is Xiaomi’s flagship model, delivering strong performance in general agentic capabilities, complex software engineering, and long-horizon tasks, with top rankings on benchmarks such as ClawEval, GDPVal, and SWE-bench Pro....

GLM 4.7

GLM-4.7 is Z.ai’s latest flagship model, featuring upgrades in two key areas: enhanced programming capabilities and more stable multi-step reasoning/execution. It demonstrates significant improvements in executing complex agent tasks while...