DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is $0.16 cheaper per 1M input tokens (37.9% lower; 1.61x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Pick DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus for lower cost; pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus for lower cost; pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is estimated at $0.74 vs $0.87 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro, saving $0.12 (14.4% lower).
Cost-first pickDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Context-first pickMiMo-V2.5-Pro
Sample savings$0.1214.4%
10x traffic gap$1.25
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has more context, but DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus saves $0.12 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $1.25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus, balanced workload favors DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus, and output-heavy chatbot favors MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | $2.61 | $1.83 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | $1.3 | $1.22 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | $4.78 | $5.02 |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is $0.08 cheaper per 1M output tokens (8.4% lower; 1.09x difference).
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 884.74K more context (6.4x larger).
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is $0.12 cheaper on the standard workload (14.4% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has the lower input price; MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the lower output price; MiMo-V2.5-Pro offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.87 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and $0.74 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus.
Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus when you care most about lower input-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is estimated at $0.74 vs $0.87 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro, saving $0.12 (14.4% lower).
- DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is $0.12 cheaper on the standard workload (14.4% lower).
- DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is $0.16 cheaper per 1M input tokens (37.9% lower; 1.61x difference).
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is $0.08 cheaper per 1M output tokens (8.4% lower; 1.09x difference).
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 884.74K more context (6.4x larger).
| Feature | 🔥MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Xiaomi) | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (DeepSeek) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.435 | $0.27 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.87 | $0.95 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.87 | $0.74 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 163.84K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #13 | #91 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is estimated at $0.74 vs $0.87 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro, saving $0.12 (14.4% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- MiMo-V2-Flash can replace MiMo-V2.5-Pro when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.25.
- MiMo-V2.5 can replace MiMo-V2.5-Pro when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.28.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) can replace DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash can replace DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.2.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsXiaomi catalog
Review all tracked Xiaomi models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Xiaomi modelsDeepSeek catalog
Check other DeepSeek models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open DeepSeek modelsMiMo-V2.5-Pro is Xiaomi’s flagship model, delivering strong performance in general agentic capabilities, complex software engineering, and long-horizon tasks, with top rankings on benchmarks such as ClawEval, GDPVal, and SWE-bench Pro....
DeepSeek-V3.1 Terminus is an update to [DeepSeek V3.1](/deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1) that maintains the model's original capabilities while addressing issues reported by users, including language consistency and agent capabilities, further optimizing the model's...