MiMo-V2-Omni is $0.6 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewGrok Build 0.1 vs MiMo-V2-Omni
Pick MiMo-V2-Omni when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick MiMo-V2-Omni when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, MiMo-V2-Omni is estimated at $1.4 vs $2 for Grok Build 0.1, saving $0.6 (30% lower).
Cost-first pickMiMo-V2-Omni
Context-first pickMiMo-V2-Omni
Sample savings$0.630%
10x traffic gap$6
MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $6. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
MiMo-V2-Omni stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | MiMo-V2-Omni | $6 | $3 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | MiMo-V2-Omni | $3 | $2.4 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | MiMo-V2-Omni | $11 | $10.4 |
Both models report the same output price at $2 per 1M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Omni has 6.14K more context (1.02x larger).
MiMo-V2-Omni is $0.6 cheaper on the standard workload (30% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
MiMo-V2-Omni has the lower input price; both models tie on output price; MiMo-V2-Omni offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $2 for Grok Build 0.1 and $1.4 for MiMo-V2-Omni.
Choose Grok Build 0.1 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
Choose MiMo-V2-Omni when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, MiMo-V2-Omni is estimated at $1.4 vs $2 for Grok Build 0.1, saving $0.6 (30% lower).
- MiMo-V2-Omni is $0.6 cheaper on the standard workload (30% lower).
- MiMo-V2-Omni is $0.6 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
- Both models report the same output price at $2 per 1M tokens.
- MiMo-V2-Omni has 6.14K more context (1.02x larger).
| Feature | NewGrok Build 0.1 (xAI) | MiMo-V2-Omni (Xiaomi) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $1 | $0.4 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $2 | $2 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $2 | $1.4 |
| Context Window | 256K | 262.14K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | MiMo-V2-Omni | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, MiMo-V2-Omni is estimated at $1.4 vs $2 for Grok Build 0.1, saving $0.6 (30% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | MiMo-V2-Omni | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Tie | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | MiMo-V2-Omni | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- MiMo-V2-Flash can replace MiMo-V2-Omni when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.25.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsxAI catalog
Review all tracked xAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open xAI modelsXiaomi catalog
Check other Xiaomi models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Xiaomi modelsGrok Build 0.1 is xAI’s fast coding model trained specifically for agentic software engineering workflows. It supports text and image inputs with text output, and is optimized for interactive coding...
MiMo-V2-Omni is a frontier omni-modal model that natively processes image, video, and audio inputs within a unified architecture. It combines strong multimodal perception with agentic capability - visual grounding, multi-step...