MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is $0.27 cheaper per 1M input tokens (27% lower; 1.37x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewGrok Build 0.1 vs NewMoonshotAI Kimi Latest
Pick Grok Build 0.1 for lower cost; pick MoonshotAI Kimi Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Grok Build 0.1 for lower cost; pick MoonshotAI Kimi Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Grok Build 0.1 is estimated at $2 vs $2.48 for MoonshotAI Kimi Latest, saving $0.48 (19.2% lower).
Cost-first pickGrok Build 0.1
Context-first pickMoonshotAI Kimi Latest
Sample savings$0.4819.2%
10x traffic gap$4.75
MoonshotAI Kimi Latest has more context, but Grok Build 0.1 saves $0.48 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $4.75. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors MoonshotAI Kimi Latest, balanced workload favors Grok Build 0.1, and output-heavy chatbot favors Grok Build 0.1.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Grok Build 0.1 | MoonshotAI Kimi Latest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | MoonshotAI Kimi Latest | $6 | $5.39 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Grok Build 0.1 | $3 | $4.22 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Grok Build 0.1 | $11 | $18.18 |
Grok Build 0.1 is $1.49 cheaper per 1M output tokens (42.7% lower; 1.75x difference).
MoonshotAI Kimi Latest has 6.14K more context (1.02x larger).
Grok Build 0.1 is $0.48 cheaper on the standard workload (19.2% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
MoonshotAI Kimi Latest has the lower input price; Grok Build 0.1 has the lower output price; MoonshotAI Kimi Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $2 for Grok Build 0.1 and $2.48 for MoonshotAI Kimi Latest.
Choose Grok Build 0.1 when you care most about lower output-token price.
Choose MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Grok Build 0.1 is estimated at $2 vs $2.48 for MoonshotAI Kimi Latest, saving $0.48 (19.2% lower).
- Grok Build 0.1 is $0.48 cheaper on the standard workload (19.2% lower).
- MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is $0.27 cheaper per 1M input tokens (27% lower; 1.37x difference).
- Grok Build 0.1 is $1.49 cheaper per 1M output tokens (42.7% lower; 1.75x difference).
- MoonshotAI Kimi Latest has 6.14K more context (1.02x larger).
| Feature | NewGrok Build 0.1 (xAI) | NewMoonshotAI Kimi Latest (MoonshotAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $1 | $0.73 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $2 | $3.49 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $2 | $2.48 |
| Context Window | 256K | 262.14K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Grok Build 0.1 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Grok Build 0.1 is estimated at $2 vs $2.48 for MoonshotAI Kimi Latest, saving $0.48 (19.2% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | MoonshotAI Kimi Latest | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Grok Build 0.1 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | MoonshotAI Kimi Latest | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Kimi K2.5 can replace MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.35.
- Kimi K2 0711 can replace MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.72.
- Kimi K2 Thinking can replace MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.85.
- Kimi K2 0905 can replace MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.85.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsxAI catalog
Review all tracked xAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open xAI modelsMoonshotAI catalog
Check other MoonshotAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open MoonshotAI modelsGrok Build 0.1 is xAI’s fast coding model trained specifically for agentic software engineering workflows. It supports text and image inputs with text output, and is optimized for interactive coding...
This model always redirects to the latest model in the MoonshotAI Kimi family.