Grok 4.20 is $0.75 cheaper per 1M input tokens (37.5% lower; 1.6x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Grok 4.20 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Pick Grok 4.20 when budget and context both matter.
Budget verdict
Pick Grok 4.20 when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Grok 4.20 is estimated at $2.5 vs $8 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, saving $5.5 (68.8% lower).
Grok 4.20 is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $55. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Grok 4.20 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Grok 4.20 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Grok 4.20 | $7.5 | $16 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Grok 4.20 | $3.75 | $14 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Grok 4.20 | $13.75 | $62 |
Grok 4.20 is $9.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (79.2% lower; 4.8x difference).
Grok 4.20 has 951.42K more context (1.91x larger).
Grok 4.20 is $5.5 cheaper on the standard workload (68.8% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Grok 4.20 has the lower input price; Grok 4.20 has the lower output price; Grok 4.20 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Grok 4.20 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $2.5 for Grok 4.20 and $8 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
Choose Grok 4.20 when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Grok 4.20 is estimated at $2.5 vs $8 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, saving $5.5 (68.8% lower).
- Grok 4.20 is $5.5 cheaper on the standard workload (68.8% lower).
- Grok 4.20 is $0.75 cheaper per 1M input tokens (37.5% lower; 1.6x difference).
- Grok 4.20 is $9.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (79.2% lower; 4.8x difference).
- Grok 4.20 has 951.42K more context (1.91x larger).
| Feature | Grok 4.20 (xAI) | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $1.25 | $2 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $2.5 | $12 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $2.5 | $8 |
| Context Window | 2M | 1.05M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Grok 4.20 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Grok 4.20 is estimated at $2.5 vs $8 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, saving $5.5 (68.8% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Grok 4.20 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Grok 4.20 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Grok 4.20 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Grok Build 0.1 can replace Grok 4.20 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $2.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsxAI catalog
Review all tracked xAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open xAI modelsGoogle catalog
Check other Google models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Google modelsGrok 4.20 is a reasoning model from xAI with industry-leading speed and agentic tool calling capabilities. It combines the lowest hallucination rate on the market with strict prompt adherance, delivering...
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is Google’s frontier reasoning model, delivering enhanced software engineering performance, improved agentic reliability, and more efficient token usage across complex workflows. Building on the multimodal foundation...