Solar Pro 3 is $0.15 cheaper per 1M input tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Solar Pro 3 vs MiniMax M2-her
Pick Solar Pro 3 when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Solar Pro 3 when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Solar Pro 3 is estimated at $0.45 vs $0.9 for MiniMax M2-her, saving $0.45 (50% lower).
Cost-first pickSolar Pro 3
Context-first pickSolar Pro 3
Sample savings$0.4550%
10x traffic gap$4.5
Solar Pro 3 is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $4.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Solar Pro 3 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Solar Pro 3 | MiniMax M2-her |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Solar Pro 3 | $1.05 | $2.1 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Solar Pro 3 | $0.75 | $1.5 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Solar Pro 3 | $3.15 | $6.3 |
Solar Pro 3 is $0.6 cheaper per 1M output tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
Solar Pro 3 has 62.46K more context (1.95x larger).
Solar Pro 3 is $0.45 cheaper on the standard workload (50% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Solar Pro 3 has the lower input price; Solar Pro 3 has the lower output price; Solar Pro 3 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Solar Pro 3 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.45 for Solar Pro 3 and $0.9 for MiniMax M2-her.
Choose Solar Pro 3 when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose MiniMax M2-her when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Solar Pro 3 is estimated at $0.45 vs $0.9 for MiniMax M2-her, saving $0.45 (50% lower).
- Solar Pro 3 is $0.45 cheaper on the standard workload (50% lower).
- Solar Pro 3 is $0.15 cheaper per 1M input tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
- Solar Pro 3 is $0.6 cheaper per 1M output tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
- Solar Pro 3 has 62.46K more context (1.95x larger).
| Feature | Solar Pro 3 (Upstage) | MiniMax M2-her (MiniMax) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.15 | $0.3 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.6 | $1.2 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.45 | $0.9 |
| Context Window | 128K | 65.54K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Solar Pro 3 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Solar Pro 3 is estimated at $0.45 vs $0.9 for MiniMax M2-her, saving $0.45 (50% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Solar Pro 3 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Solar Pro 3 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Solar Pro 3 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- MiniMax M2.5 (free) can replace MiniMax M2-her when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- MiniMax M2.5 can replace MiniMax M2-her when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.72.
- MiniMax-01 can replace MiniMax M2-her when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.75.
- MiniMax M2 can replace MiniMax M2-her when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.76.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro offers 1.05M context with $0.87 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsUpstage catalog
Review all tracked Upstage models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Upstage modelsMiniMax catalog
Check other MiniMax models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open MiniMax modelsSolar Pro 3 is Upstage's powerful Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model. With 102B total parameters and 12B active parameters per forward pass, it delivers exceptional performance while maintaining computational efficiency. Optimized...
MiniMax M2-her is a dialogue-first large language model built for immersive roleplay, character-driven chat, and expressive multi-turn conversations. Designed to stay consistent in tone and personality, it supports rich message...