API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewSolar Mini 4 vs Laguna XS 2.1

Pick Laguna XS 2.1 for lower cost; pick Solar Mini 4 only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Laguna XS 2.1 for lower cost; pick Solar Mini 4 only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Laguna XS 2.1 is estimated at $0.12 vs $0.15 for Solar Mini 4, saving $0.03 (20% lower).

Cost-first pickLaguna XS 2.1
Context-first pickSolar Mini 4
Sample savings$0.0320%
10x traffic gap$0.3

Solar Mini 4 has more context, but Laguna XS 2.1 saves $0.03 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.3. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Solar Mini 4, balanced workload favors Laguna XS 2.1, and output-heavy chatbot favors Laguna XS 2.1.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickSolar Mini 4Laguna XS 2.1
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputSolar Mini 4$0.35$0.36
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputLaguna XS 2.1$0.25$0.18
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputLaguna XS 2.1$1.05$0.66
Cheaper input Solar Mini 4 $0.05 vs $0.06 / 1M

Solar Mini 4 is $0.01 cheaper per 1M input tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).

Cheaper output Laguna XS 2.1 $0.2 vs $0.12 / 1M

Laguna XS 2.1 is $0.08 cheaper per 1M output tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).

Larger context Solar Mini 4 524.29K vs 262.14K

Solar Mini 4 has 262.14K more context (2x larger).

Sample workload Laguna XS 2.1 $0.15 vs $0.12

Laguna XS 2.1 is $0.03 cheaper on the standard workload (20% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Solar Mini 4 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Laguna XS 2.1 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Solar Mini 4 has the lower input price; Laguna XS 2.1 has the lower output price; Solar Mini 4 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Laguna XS 2.1 is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.15 for Solar Mini 4 and $0.12 for Laguna XS 2.1.

Best Fit

Choose Solar Mini 4 when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.

Choose Laguna XS 2.1 when you care most about lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Laguna XS 2.1 is estimated at $0.12 vs $0.15 for Solar Mini 4, saving $0.03 (20% lower).
  • Laguna XS 2.1 is $0.03 cheaper on the standard workload (20% lower).
  • Solar Mini 4 is $0.01 cheaper per 1M input tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).
  • Laguna XS 2.1 is $0.08 cheaper per 1M output tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).
  • Solar Mini 4 has 262.14K more context (2x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureNewSolar Mini 4
(Upstage)
Laguna XS 2.1
(Poolside)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$0.05$0.06
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$0.2$0.12
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$0.15$0.12
Context Window524.29K262.14K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionLaguna XS 2.1On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Laguna XS 2.1 is estimated at $0.12 vs $0.15 for Solar Mini 4, saving $0.03 (20% lower).
High-volume input processingSolar Mini 4Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsLaguna XS 2.1Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workSolar Mini 4A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • Laguna S 2.1 (free) can replace Laguna XS 2.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • Laguna XS 2.1 (free) can replace Laguna XS 2.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • Laguna XS.2 (free) can replace Laguna XS 2.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • Laguna M.1 (free) can replace Laguna XS 2.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Upstage catalog

Review all tracked Upstage models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Upstage models

Poolside catalog

Check other Poolside models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Poolside models
Solar Mini 4

Solar Mini 4 is Upstage's compact, cost-efficient language model, a 35B-parameter mixture-of-experts with 3B active parameters and a 524K context window. It is built for agentic use cases where response...

Laguna XS 2.1

Laguna XS 2.1 is the latest coding agent model in the 33B-A3B category from [Poolside](https://poolside.ai/) and a step forward from their Laguna XS.2 model (released in April 2026). It combines...