API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewSolar Mini 4 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Pick Solar Mini 4 for lower cost; pick Muse Spark 1.3 only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Solar Mini 4 for lower cost; pick Muse Spark 1.3 only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Solar Mini 4 is estimated at $0.15 vs $3.38 for Muse Spark 1.3, saving $3.23 (95.6% lower).

Cost-first pickSolar Mini 4
Context-first pickMuse Spark 1.3
Sample savings$3.2395.6%
10x traffic gap$32.25

Muse Spark 1.3 has more context, but Solar Mini 4 saves $3.23 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $32.25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Solar Mini 4 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickSolar Mini 4Muse Spark 1.3
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputSolar Mini 4$0.35$8.38
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputSolar Mini 4$0.25$5.5
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputSolar Mini 4$1.05$22.5
Cheaper input Solar Mini 4 $0.05 vs $1.25 / 1M

Solar Mini 4 is $1.2 cheaper per 1M input tokens (96% lower; 25x difference).

Cheaper output Solar Mini 4 $0.2 vs $4.25 / 1M

Solar Mini 4 is $4.05 cheaper per 1M output tokens (95.3% lower; 21.2x difference).

Larger context Muse Spark 1.3 524.29K vs 1.05M

Muse Spark 1.3 has 524.29K more context (2x larger).

Sample workload Solar Mini 4 $0.15 vs $3.38

Solar Mini 4 is $3.23 cheaper on the standard workload (95.6% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Solar Mini 4 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Muse Spark 1.3 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Solar Mini 4 has the lower input price; Solar Mini 4 has the lower output price; Muse Spark 1.3 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Solar Mini 4 is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.15 for Solar Mini 4 and $3.38 for Muse Spark 1.3.

Best Fit

Choose Solar Mini 4 when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Choose Muse Spark 1.3 when you care most about larger context window.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Solar Mini 4 is estimated at $0.15 vs $3.38 for Muse Spark 1.3, saving $3.23 (95.6% lower).
  • Solar Mini 4 is $3.23 cheaper on the standard workload (95.6% lower).
  • Solar Mini 4 is $1.2 cheaper per 1M input tokens (96% lower; 25x difference).
  • Solar Mini 4 is $4.05 cheaper per 1M output tokens (95.3% lower; 21.2x difference).
  • Muse Spark 1.3 has 524.29K more context (2x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureNewSolar Mini 4
(Upstage)
Muse Spark 1.3
(Meta)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$0.05$1.25
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$0.2$4.25
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$0.15$3.38
Context Window524.29K1.05M
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionSolar Mini 4On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Solar Mini 4 is estimated at $0.15 vs $3.38 for Muse Spark 1.3, saving $3.23 (95.6% lower).
High-volume input processingSolar Mini 4Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsSolar Mini 4Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workMuse Spark 1.3A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Upstage catalog

Review all tracked Upstage models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Upstage models

Meta catalog

Check other Meta models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Meta models
Solar Mini 4

Solar Mini 4 is Upstage's compact, cost-efficient language model, a 35B-parameter mixture-of-experts with 3B active parameters and a 524K context window. It is built for agentic use cases where response...

Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 is a multimodal reasoning model from Meta for long-running agentic, multi-agent, and coding workflows. It is designed to keep track of information across extended tasks, work through...