Perceptron Mk1 is $0.3 cheaper per 1M input tokens (66.7% lower; 3x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Inkling Small vs Perceptron Mk1
Pick Perceptron Mk1 for lower cost; pick Inkling Small only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Perceptron Mk1 for lower cost; pick Inkling Small only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Perceptron Mk1 is estimated at $0.9 vs $1.05 for Inkling Small, saving $0.15 (14.3% lower).
Cost-first pickPerceptron Mk1
Context-first pickInkling Small
Sample savings$0.1514.3%
10x traffic gap$1.5
Inkling Small has more context, but Perceptron Mk1 saves $0.15 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $1.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Perceptron Mk1, balanced workload favors Tie, and output-heavy chatbot favors Inkling Small.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Inkling Small | Perceptron Mk1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Perceptron Mk1 | $2.85 | $1.5 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Tie | $1.65 | $1.65 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Inkling Small | $6.45 | $7.65 |
Inkling Small is $0.3 cheaper per 1M output tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
Inkling Small has 1.02M more context (32x larger).
Perceptron Mk1 is $0.15 cheaper on the standard workload (14.3% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Perceptron Mk1 has the lower input price; Inkling Small has the lower output price; Inkling Small offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Perceptron Mk1 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.05 for Inkling Small and $0.9 for Perceptron Mk1.
Choose Inkling Small when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Perceptron Mk1 when you care most about lower input-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Perceptron Mk1 is estimated at $0.9 vs $1.05 for Inkling Small, saving $0.15 (14.3% lower).
- Perceptron Mk1 is $0.15 cheaper on the standard workload (14.3% lower).
- Perceptron Mk1 is $0.3 cheaper per 1M input tokens (66.7% lower; 3x difference).
- Inkling Small is $0.3 cheaper per 1M output tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
- Inkling Small has 1.02M more context (32x larger).
| Feature | Inkling Small (Thinking Machines) | Perceptron Mk1 (Perceptron) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.45 | $0.15 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $1.2 | $1.5 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $1.05 | $0.9 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 32.77K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Perceptron Mk1 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Perceptron Mk1 is estimated at $0.9 vs $1.05 for Inkling Small, saving $0.15 (14.3% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Perceptron Mk1 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Inkling Small | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Inkling Small | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Inkling Small (free) can replace Inkling Small when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Inkling (free) can replace Inkling Small when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.17 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.11 sample workload cost.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.5 offers 1.05M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
- Hy3 · Tencent · #3
- Ox Alpha · stealth · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsThinking Machines catalog
Review all tracked Thinking Machines models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Thinking Machines modelsPerceptron catalog
Check other Perceptron models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Perceptron modelsInkling Small is an open-weight multimodal mixture-of-experts model from Thinking Machines Lab, with 12B active parameters out of 276B total. It is positioned as the smaller, more efficient member of...
Perceptron Mk1 (Mark One) is Perceptron's highest-quality vision-language model for video and embodied reasoning.** It accepts image and video inputs paired with natural language queries, and produces detailed visual understanding...