Both models report the same input price at $1 per 1M tokens.
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Inkling (batch) vs Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest
Pick Inkling (batch) when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Inkling (batch) when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Inkling (batch) is estimated at $3.02 vs $3.5 for Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest, saving $0.48 (13.6% lower).
Cost-first pickInkling (batch)
Context-first pickInkling (batch)
Sample savings$0.4813.6%
10x traffic gap$4.75
Inkling (batch) is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $4.75. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Inkling (batch) stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Inkling (batch) | Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Inkling (batch) | $7.03 | $7.5 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Inkling (batch) | $5.05 | $6 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Inkling (batch) | $21.25 | $26 |
Inkling (batch) is $0.95 cheaper per 1M output tokens (19% lower; 1.23x difference).
Inkling (batch) has 324.29K more context (2.62x larger).
Inkling (batch) is $0.48 cheaper on the standard workload (13.6% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
both models tie on input price; Inkling (batch) has the lower output price; Inkling (batch) offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Inkling (batch) is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $3.02 for Inkling (batch) and $3.5 for Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest.
Choose Inkling (batch) when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Inkling (batch) is estimated at $3.02 vs $3.5 for Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest, saving $0.48 (13.6% lower).
- Inkling (batch) is $0.48 cheaper on the standard workload (13.6% lower).
- Both models report the same input price at $1 per 1M tokens.
- Inkling (batch) is $0.95 cheaper per 1M output tokens (19% lower; 1.23x difference).
- Inkling (batch) has 324.29K more context (2.62x larger).
| Feature | Inkling (batch) (Thinking Machines) | Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $1 | $1 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $4.05 | $5 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $3.02 | $3.5 |
| Context Window | 524.29K | 200K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Inkling (batch) | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Inkling (batch) is estimated at $3.02 vs $3.5 for Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest, saving $0.48 (13.6% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Tie | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Inkling (batch) | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Inkling (batch) | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Inkling Small (free) can replace Inkling (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Inkling (free) can replace Inkling (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Inkling Small can replace Inkling (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.05.
- Claude 3 Haiku can replace Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.88.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.17 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.11 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
- Hy3 · Tencent · #3
- Ox Alpha · stealth · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsThinking Machines catalog
Review all tracked Thinking Machines models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Thinking Machines modelsAnthropic catalog
Check other Anthropic models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Anthropic modelsInkling is an open-weight multimodal mixture-of-experts model from Thinking Machines Lab, with 41B active parameters out of 975B total. It is designed for general-purpose reasoning, coding, agentic and tool-use systems,...
This model always redirects to the latest model in the Anthropic Claude Haiku family.