API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewHy4 vs Granite 4.2 8B

Pick Granite 4.2 8B for lower cost; pick Hy4 only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Granite 4.2 8B for lower cost; pick Hy4 only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Granite 4.2 8B is estimated at $0.18 vs $1.04 for Hy4, saving $0.86 (82.2% lower).

Cost-first pickGranite 4.2 8B
Context-first pickHy4
Sample savings$0.8682.2%
10x traffic gap$8.57

Hy4 has more context, but Granite 4.2 8B saves $0.86 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $8.57. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Granite 4.2 8B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickHy4Granite 4.2 8B
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputGranite 4.2 8B$2.71$0.42
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputGranite 4.2 8B$1.67$0.31
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputGranite 4.2 8B$6.67$1.31
Cheaper input Granite 4.2 8B $0.417 vs $0.06 / 1M

Granite 4.2 8B is $0.36 cheaper per 1M input tokens (85.6% lower; 6.95x difference).

Cheaper output Granite 4.2 8B $1.2505 vs $0.25 / 1M

Granite 4.2 8B is $1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (80% lower; 5x difference).

Larger context Hy4 1.05M vs 131.07K

Hy4 has 917.5K more context (8x larger).

Sample workload Granite 4.2 8B $1.04 vs $0.18

Granite 4.2 8B is $0.86 cheaper on the standard workload (82.2% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Hy4 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Granite 4.2 8B Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Granite 4.2 8B has the lower input price; Granite 4.2 8B has the lower output price; Hy4 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.04 for Hy4 and $0.18 for Granite 4.2 8B.

Best Fit

Choose Hy4 when you care most about larger context window.

Choose Granite 4.2 8B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Granite 4.2 8B is estimated at $0.18 vs $1.04 for Hy4, saving $0.86 (82.2% lower).
  • Granite 4.2 8B is $0.86 cheaper on the standard workload (82.2% lower).
  • Granite 4.2 8B is $0.36 cheaper per 1M input tokens (85.6% lower; 6.95x difference).
  • Granite 4.2 8B is $1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (80% lower; 5x difference).
  • Hy4 has 917.5K more context (8x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureNewHy4
(Tencent)		Granite 4.2 8B
(IBM)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M		$0.417$0.06
Completion Price
per 1M tokens		$1.2505$0.25
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output		$1.04$0.18
Context Window1.05M131.07K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionGranite 4.2 8BOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Granite 4.2 8B is estimated at $0.18 vs $1.04 for Hy4, saving $0.86 (82.2% lower).
High-volume input processingGranite 4.2 8BLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsGranite 4.2 8BLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workHy4A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • Hy3 (free) can replace Hy4 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • Hy-MT2-1.8B can replace Hy4 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
  • Hy-MT2-30B-A3B can replace Hy4 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.22.
  • Hy-MT2-7B can replace Hy4 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.22.
Larger context near this budget
  • Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-6 Luna offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-5.6 Luna offers 1.05M context with $0.8 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-6 Luna Pro offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Tencent catalog

Review all tracked Tencent models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Tencent models

IBM catalog

Check other IBM models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open IBM models
Hy4

The official release of Hy4 delivers comprehensive and substantial improvements over Hy4 Preview, with particularly strong gains in agentic capabilities and performance across a wide range of long-horizon, real-world productivity...

Granite 4.2 8B

Granite 4.2 8B is a dense reasoning model from IBM. It is suited for mathematics, code generation, multilingual dialogue, and agentic workflows that need multi-step reasoning. It supports full, low-effort,...