API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewHy4 vs Command A+

Pick Hy4 when budget and context both matter.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Hy4 when budget and context both matter.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Hy4 is estimated at $1.04 vs $1.05 for Command A+, saving $0.0078 (0.7% lower).

Cost-first pickHy4
Context-first pickHy4
Sample savings$0.00780.7%
10x traffic gap$0.08

Hy4 is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.08. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Command A+, balanced workload favors Hy4, and output-heavy chatbot favors Hy4.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickHy4Command A+
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputCommand A+$2.71$2.25
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputHy4$1.67$1.8
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputHy4$6.67$7.8
Cheaper input Command A+ $0.417 vs $0.3 / 1M

Command A+ is $0.12 cheaper per 1M input tokens (28.1% lower; 1.39x difference).

Cheaper output Hy4 $1.2505 vs $1.5 / 1M

Hy4 is $0.25 cheaper per 1M output tokens (16.6% lower; 1.2x difference).

Larger context Hy4 1.05M vs 192K

Hy4 has 856.58K more context (5.46x larger).

Sample workload Hy4 $1.04 vs $1.05

Hy4 is $0.0078 cheaper on the standard workload (0.7% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Hy4 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Command A+ Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Command A+ has the lower input price; Hy4 has the lower output price; Hy4 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Hy4 is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.04 for Hy4 and $1.05 for Command A+.

Best Fit

Choose Hy4 when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.

Choose Command A+ when you care most about lower input-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Hy4 is estimated at $1.04 vs $1.05 for Command A+, saving $0.0078 (0.7% lower).
  • Hy4 is $0.0078 cheaper on the standard workload (0.7% lower).
  • Command A+ is $0.12 cheaper per 1M input tokens (28.1% lower; 1.39x difference).
  • Hy4 is $0.25 cheaper per 1M output tokens (16.6% lower; 1.2x difference).
  • Hy4 has 856.58K more context (5.46x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureNewHy4
(Tencent)		Command A+
(Cohere)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M		$0.417$0.3
Completion Price
per 1M tokens		$1.2505$1.5
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output		$1.04$1.05
Context Window1.05M192K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionHy4On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Hy4 is estimated at $1.04 vs $1.05 for Command A+, saving $0.0078 (0.7% lower).
High-volume input processingCommand A+Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsHy4Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workHy4A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • Hy3 (free) can replace Hy4 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • Hy-MT2-1.8B can replace Hy4 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
  • Hy-MT2-30B-A3B can replace Hy4 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.22.
  • Hy-MT2-7B can replace Hy4 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.22.
Larger context near this budget
  • Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-6 Luna offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-5.6 Luna offers 1.05M context with $0.8 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-6 Luna Pro offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Tencent catalog

Review all tracked Tencent models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Tencent models

Cohere catalog

Check other Cohere models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Cohere models
Hy4

The official release of Hy4 delivers comprehensive and substantial improvements over Hy4 Preview, with particularly strong gains in agentic capabilities and performance across a wide range of long-horizon, real-world productivity...

Command A+

Command A+ is Cohere's flagship model for enterprise agentic workflows. It accepts text and image inputs with a 192K context window, supports native tool calling with strict tool schemas, structured...