Hy3 is $0.07 cheaper per 1M input tokens (34% lower; 1.52x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥Hy3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Pick Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety for lower cost; pick Hy3 only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety for lower cost; pick Hy3 only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is estimated at $0.3 vs $0.4 for Hy3, saving $0.1 (24.2% lower).
Cost-first pickNemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Context-first pickHy3
Sample savings$0.124.2%
10x traffic gap$0.96
Hy3 has more context, but Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety saves $0.1 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.96. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Hy3, balanced workload favors Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety, and output-heavy chatbot favors Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Hy3 | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Hy3 | $0.92 | $1.1 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety | $0.66 | $0.4 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety | $2.77 | $1.2 |
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is $0.33 cheaper per 1M output tokens (62.1% lower; 2.64x difference).
Hy3 has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is $0.1 cheaper on the standard workload (24.2% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Hy3 has the lower input price; Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has the lower output price; Hy3 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.4 for Hy3 and $0.3 for Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety.
Choose Hy3 when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety when you care most about lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is estimated at $0.3 vs $0.4 for Hy3, saving $0.1 (24.2% lower).
- Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is $0.1 cheaper on the standard workload (24.2% lower).
- Hy3 is $0.07 cheaper per 1M input tokens (34% lower; 1.52x difference).
- Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is $0.33 cheaper per 1M output tokens (62.1% lower; 2.64x difference).
- Hy3 has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
| Feature | 🔥Hy3 (Tencent) | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (NVIDIA) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.132 | $0.2 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.528 | $0.2 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.4 | $0.3 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 131.07K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #5 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is estimated at $0.3 vs $0.4 for Hy3, saving $0.1 (24.2% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Hy3 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Hy3 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Hy3 (free) can replace Hy3 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Hy-MT2-1.8B can replace Hy3 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- Hy-MT2-30B-A3B can replace Hy3 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.22.
- Hy-MT2-7B can replace Hy3 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.22.
- GLM 5.3 Flash offers 1.31M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.15 sample workload cost.
- GLM Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.13 sample workload cost.
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #1
- GPT-5.6 Luna · OpenAI · #2
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #3
- Hy4 preview · Tencent · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsTencent catalog
Review all tracked Tencent models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Tencent modelsNVIDIA catalog
Check other NVIDIA models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open NVIDIA modelsHy3 is a 295B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model from Tencent (21B active, 192 experts with top-8 routing) built for reasoning, agentic workflows, and real-world production use. It supports a configurable reasoning effort:...
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is a compact 4B-parameter multimodal guardrail model from NVIDIA, fine-tuned from Google Gemma-3-4B. It moderates both inputs to and responses from LLMs and VLMs, accepting...