Ring-2.6-1T is $0.06 cheaper per 1M input tokens (43.2% lower; 1.76x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥Hy3 vs Ring-2.6-1T
Pick Ring-2.6-1T when budget is the priority.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Ring-2.6-1T when budget is the priority.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ring-2.6-1T is estimated at $0.39 vs $0.4 for Hy3, saving $0.0085 (2.1% lower).
Cost-first pickRing-2.6-1T
Context-first pickBoth models
Sample savings$0.00852.1%
10x traffic gap$0.09
The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.09. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Ring-2.6-1T, balanced workload favors Hy3, and output-heavy chatbot favors Hy3.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Hy3 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Ring-2.6-1T | $0.92 | $0.69 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Hy3 | $0.66 | $0.7 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Hy3 | $2.77 | $3.2 |
Hy3 is $0.1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (15.5% lower; 1.18x difference).
Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.
Ring-2.6-1T is $0.0085 cheaper on the standard workload (2.1% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Ring-2.6-1T has the lower input price; Hy3 has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Ring-2.6-1T is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.4 for Hy3 and $0.39 for Ring-2.6-1T.
Choose Hy3 when you care most about lower output-token price.
Choose Ring-2.6-1T when you care most about lower input-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ring-2.6-1T is estimated at $0.39 vs $0.4 for Hy3, saving $0.0085 (2.1% lower).
- Ring-2.6-1T is $0.0085 cheaper on the standard workload (2.1% lower).
- Ring-2.6-1T is $0.06 cheaper per 1M input tokens (43.2% lower; 1.76x difference).
- Hy3 is $0.1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (15.5% lower; 1.18x difference).
- Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.
| Feature | 🔥Hy3 (Tencent) | Ring-2.6-1T (inclusionAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.132 | $0.075 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.528 | $0.625 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.4 | $0.39 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 262.14K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #3 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Ring-2.6-1T | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ring-2.6-1T is estimated at $0.39 vs $0.4 for Hy3, saving $0.0085 (2.1% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Ring-2.6-1T | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Hy3 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Tie | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Hy3 (free) can replace Hy3 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Hy-MT2-1.8B can replace Hy3 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- Hy-MT2-30B-A3B can replace Hy3 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.22.
- Hy-MT2-7B can replace Hy3 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.22.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.17 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.11 sample workload cost.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.5 offers 1.05M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
- Ox Alpha · stealth · #4
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 · DeepSeek · #5
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsTencent catalog
Review all tracked Tencent models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Tencent modelsinclusionAI catalog
Check other inclusionAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open inclusionAI modelsHy3 is a 295B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model from Tencent (21B active, 192 experts with top-8 routing) built for reasoning, agentic workflows, and real-world production use. It supports a configurable reasoning effort:...
Ring-2.6-1T is a 1T-parameter-scale thinking model with 63B active parameters, built for real-world agent workflows that require both strong capability and operational efficiency. It is optimized for coding agents, tool...