Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is free for input tokens while Hy3 costs $0.13 per 1M tokens.
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥Hy3 vs NewLing 3.0 Flash VL (free)
Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) when budget is the priority.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) when budget is the priority.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is estimated at $0 vs $0.4 for Hy3, saving $0.4 (100% lower).
Cost-first pickLing 3.0 Flash VL (free)
Context-first pickBoth models
Sample savings$0.4100%
10x traffic gap$3.96
The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $3.96. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Hy3 | Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) | $0.92 | $0 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) | $0.66 | $0 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) | $2.77 | $0 |
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is free for output tokens while Hy3 costs $0.53 per 1M tokens.
Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $0.4.
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) has the lower input price; Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.4 for Hy3 and $0 for Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free).
Choose Hy3 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
Choose Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is estimated at $0 vs $0.4 for Hy3, saving $0.4 (100% lower).
- Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $0.4.
- Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is free for input tokens while Hy3 costs $0.13 per 1M tokens.
- Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is free for output tokens while Hy3 costs $0.53 per 1M tokens.
- Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.
| Feature | 🔥Hy3 (Tencent) | NewLing 3.0 Flash VL (free) (inclusionAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.132 | $0 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.528 | $0 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.4 | $0 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 262.14K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #8 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is estimated at $0 vs $0.4 for Hy3, saving $0.4 (100% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Tie | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Hy3 (free) can replace Hy3 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Hy-MT2-1.8B can replace Hy3 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- Hy-MT2-30B-A3B can replace Hy3 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.22.
- Hy-MT2-7B can replace Hy3 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.22.
- GLM 5.3 Flash offers 1.31M context with $0.4 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.08 sample workload cost.
- GLM Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.08 sample workload cost.
- Hy4 preview · Tencent · #1
- GPT-5.6 Luna · OpenAI · #2
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #3
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsTencent catalog
Review all tracked Tencent models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Tencent modelsinclusionAI catalog
Check other inclusionAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open inclusionAI modelsHy3 is a 295B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model from Tencent (21B active, 192 experts with top-8 routing) built for reasoning, agentic workflows, and real-world production use. It supports a configurable reasoning effort:...
Ling 3.0 Flash VL builds on Ling 3.0 Flash (124B total / 5.5B active MoE from InclusionAI), further strengthening its language capabilities while adding native visual perception and advanced visual...