Hy3 preview is $0.03 cheaper per 1M input tokens (34% lower; 1.52x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥Hy3 preview vs GLM 4 32B
Pick GLM 4 32B for lower cost; pick Hy3 preview only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick GLM 4 32B for lower cost; pick Hy3 preview only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 4 32B is estimated at $0.15 vs $0.2 for Hy3 preview, saving $0.05 (23.5% lower).
Cost-first pickGLM 4 32B
Context-first pickHy3 preview
Sample savings$0.0523.5%
10x traffic gap$0.46
Hy3 preview has more context, but GLM 4 32B saves $0.05 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.46. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Hy3 preview, balanced workload favors GLM 4 32B, and output-heavy chatbot favors GLM 4 32B.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Hy3 preview | GLM 4 32B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Hy3 preview | $0.46 | $0.55 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | GLM 4 32B | $0.33 | $0.2 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | GLM 4 32B | $1.37 | $0.6 |
GLM 4 32B is $0.16 cheaper per 1M output tokens (61.5% lower; 2.6x difference).
Hy3 preview has 134.14K more context (2.05x larger).
GLM 4 32B is $0.05 cheaper on the standard workload (23.5% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Hy3 preview has the lower input price; GLM 4 32B has the lower output price; Hy3 preview offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GLM 4 32B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.2 for Hy3 preview and $0.15 for GLM 4 32B.
Choose Hy3 preview when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.
Choose GLM 4 32B when you care most about lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 4 32B is estimated at $0.15 vs $0.2 for Hy3 preview, saving $0.05 (23.5% lower).
- GLM 4 32B is $0.05 cheaper on the standard workload (23.5% lower).
- Hy3 preview is $0.03 cheaper per 1M input tokens (34% lower; 1.52x difference).
- GLM 4 32B is $0.16 cheaper per 1M output tokens (61.5% lower; 2.6x difference).
- Hy3 preview has 134.14K more context (2.05x larger).
| Feature | 🔥Hy3 preview (Tencent) | GLM 4 32B (Z.ai) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.066 | $0.1 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.26 | $0.1 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.2 | $0.15 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 128K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #2 | #147 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | GLM 4 32B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 4 32B is estimated at $0.15 vs $0.2 for Hy3 preview, saving $0.05 (23.5% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Hy3 preview | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | GLM 4 32B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Hy3 preview | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- GLM 4.5 Air (free) can replace GLM 4 32B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
- Owl Alpha · OpenRouter · #5
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsTencent catalog
Review all tracked Tencent models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Tencent modelsZ.ai catalog
Check other Z.ai models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Z.ai modelsHy3 preview is a high-efficiency Mixture-of-Experts model from Tencent designed for agentic workflows and production use. It supports configurable reasoning levels across disabled, low, and high modes, allowing it to...
GLM 4 32B is a cost-effective foundation language model. It can efficiently perform complex tasks and has significantly enhanced capabilities in tool use, online search, and code-related intelligent tasks. It...