Hy3 preview is $0.05 cheaper per 1M input tokens (45% lower; 1.82x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥Hy3 preview vs 🔥Gemma 4 31B
Pick Hy3 preview when budget is the priority.
Pricing data updated:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Hy3 preview when budget is the priority.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Hy3 preview is estimated at $0.2 vs $0.3 for Gemma 4 31B, saving $0.11 (35.7% lower).
Cost-first pickHy3 preview
Context-first pickBoth models
Sample savings$0.1135.7%
10x traffic gap$1.09
The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $1.09. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Hy3 preview is $0.11 cheaper per 1M output tokens (29.7% lower; 1.42x difference).
Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.
Hy3 preview is $0.11 cheaper on the standard workload (35.7% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Hy3 preview has the lower input price; Hy3 preview has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Hy3 preview is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.2 for Hy3 preview and $0.3 for Gemma 4 31B.
Choose Hy3 preview when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose Gemma 4 31B when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Hy3 preview is estimated at $0.2 vs $0.3 for Gemma 4 31B, saving $0.11 (35.7% lower).
- Hy3 preview is $0.11 cheaper on the standard workload (35.7% lower).
- Hy3 preview is $0.05 cheaper per 1M input tokens (45% lower; 1.82x difference).
- Hy3 preview is $0.11 cheaper per 1M output tokens (29.7% lower; 1.42x difference).
- Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.
| Feature | 🔥Hy3 preview (Tencent) | 🔥Gemma 4 31B (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.066 | $0.12 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.26 | $0.37 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.2 | $0.3 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 262.14K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity Rank current rank | #2 | #18 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Hy3 preview | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Hy3 preview is estimated at $0.2 vs $0.3 for Gemma 4 31B, saving $0.11 (35.7% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Hy3 preview | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Hy3 preview | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Tie | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemma 4 31B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemma 4 31B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Gemma 4 31B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Clip Preview can replace Gemma 4 31B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.22 sample workload cost.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite offers 1.05M context with $0.3 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #3
- Owl Alpha · OpenRouter · #4
- DeepSeek V3.2 · DeepSeek · #5
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models ranked by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsTencent catalog
Review all tracked Tencent models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Tencent modelsGoogle catalog
Check other Google models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Google modelsHy3 preview is a high-efficiency Mixture-of-Experts model from Tencent designed for agentic workflows and production use. It supports configurable reasoning levels across disabled, low, and high modes, allowing it to...
Gemma 4 31B Instruct is Google DeepMind's 30.7B dense multimodal model supporting text and image input with text output. Features a 256K token context window, configurable thinking/reasoning mode, native function...