API cost decision in 10 seconds

Hy3 preview vs Claude Opus Latest

Pick Hy3 preview for lower cost; pick Claude Opus Latest only if the larger context window matters more.

Pricing data updated:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Hy3 preview for lower cost; pick Claude Opus Latest only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Hy3 preview is estimated at $0.2 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus Latest, saving $17.3 (98.9% lower).

Cost-first pickHy3 preview
Context-first pickClaude Opus Latest
Sample savings$17.398.9%
10x traffic gap$173.04

Claude Opus Latest has more context, but Hy3 preview saves $17.3 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $173.04. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Hy3 preview stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickHy3 previewClaude Opus Latest
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputHy3 preview$0.46$37.5
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputHy3 preview$0.33$30
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputHy3 preview$1.37$130
Cheaper input Hy3 preview $0.066 vs $5 / 1M

Hy3 preview is $4.93 cheaper per 1M input tokens (98.7% lower; 75.8x difference).

Cheaper output Hy3 preview $0.26 vs $25 / 1M

Hy3 preview is $24.74 cheaper per 1M output tokens (99% lower; 96.2x difference).

Larger context Claude Opus Latest 262.14K vs 1M

Claude Opus Latest has 737.86K more context (3.81x larger).

Sample workload Hy3 preview $0.2 vs $17.5

Hy3 preview is $17.3 cheaper on the standard workload (98.9% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Hy3 preview Calculating… Estimated API cost
Claude Opus Latest Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Hy3 preview has the lower input price; Hy3 preview has the lower output price; Claude Opus Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Hy3 preview is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.2 for Hy3 preview and $17.5 for Claude Opus Latest.

Best Fit

Choose Hy3 preview when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Choose Claude Opus Latest when you care most about larger context window.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Hy3 preview is estimated at $0.2 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus Latest, saving $17.3 (98.9% lower).
  • Hy3 preview is $17.3 cheaper on the standard workload (98.9% lower).
  • Hy3 preview is $4.93 cheaper per 1M input tokens (98.7% lower; 75.8x difference).
  • Hy3 preview is $24.74 cheaper per 1M output tokens (99% lower; 96.2x difference).
  • Claude Opus Latest has 737.86K more context (3.81x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureHy3 preview
(Tencent)
Claude Opus Latest
(Anthropic)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$0.066$5
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$0.26$25
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$0.2$17.5
Context Window262.14K1M
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionHy3 previewOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Hy3 preview is estimated at $0.2 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus Latest, saving $17.3 (98.9% lower).
High-volume input processingHy3 previewLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsHy3 previewLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workClaude Opus LatestA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • Claude 3 Haiku can replace Claude Opus Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.88.
  • Claude 3.5 Haiku can replace Claude Opus Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $2.8.
  • Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest can replace Claude Opus Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 can replace Claude Opus Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
Popular competitors
  • No popular competitor is currently available.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Tencent catalog

Review all tracked Tencent models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Tencent models

Anthropic catalog

Check other Anthropic models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Anthropic models
Hy3 preview

Hy3 preview is a high-efficiency Mixture-of-Experts model from Tencent designed for agentic workflows and production use. It supports configurable reasoning levels across disabled, low, and high modes, allowing it to...

Claude Opus Latest

This model always redirects to the latest model in the Claude Opus family.