Hy-MT2-1.8B is $0.1 cheaper per 1M input tokens (68.6% lower; 3.18x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewHy-MT2-1.8B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch)
Pick Hy-MT2-1.8B for lower cost; pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) only if the larger context window matters more.
Budget verdict
Pick Hy-MT2-1.8B for lower cost; pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Hy-MT2-1.8B is estimated at $0.13 vs $0.28 for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch), saving $0.15 (52.7% lower).
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) has more context, but Hy-MT2-1.8B saves $0.15 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $1.48. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Hy-MT2-1.8B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Hy-MT2-1.8B | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Hy-MT2-1.8B | $0.31 | $0.84 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Hy-MT2-1.8B | $0.22 | $0.42 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Hy-MT2-1.8B | $0.93 | $1.54 |
Hy-MT2-1.8B is $0.1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (36.8% lower; 1.58x difference).
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) has 1.04M more context (128x larger).
Hy-MT2-1.8B is $0.15 cheaper on the standard workload (52.7% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Hy-MT2-1.8B has the lower input price; Hy-MT2-1.8B has the lower output price; DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Hy-MT2-1.8B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.13 for Hy-MT2-1.8B and $0.28 for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch).
Choose Hy-MT2-1.8B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) when you care most about larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Hy-MT2-1.8B is estimated at $0.13 vs $0.28 for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch), saving $0.15 (52.7% lower).
- Hy-MT2-1.8B is $0.15 cheaper on the standard workload (52.7% lower).
- Hy-MT2-1.8B is $0.1 cheaper per 1M input tokens (68.6% lower; 3.18x difference).
- Hy-MT2-1.8B is $0.1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (36.8% lower; 1.58x difference).
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) has 1.04M more context (128x larger).
| Feature | NewHy-MT2-1.8B (Tencent) | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) (DeepSeek) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.044 | $0.14 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.177 | $0.28 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.13 | $0.28 |
| Context Window | 8.19K | 1.05M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Hy-MT2-1.8B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Hy-MT2-1.8B is estimated at $0.13 vs $0.28 for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch), saving $0.15 (52.7% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Hy-MT2-1.8B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Hy-MT2-1.8B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Hy3 (free) can replace Hy-MT2-1.8B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) can replace DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 can replace DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 can replace DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.17.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.1 sample workload cost.
- GLM 5.3 Flash offers 1.31M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.08 sample workload cost.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
- Hy3 · Tencent · #3
- Nemotron 3 Ultra (free) · NVIDIA · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsTencent catalog
Review all tracked Tencent models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Tencent modelsDeepSeek catalog
Check other DeepSeek models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open DeepSeek modelsHy-MT2-1.8B is a compact 1.8B-parameter translation model from Tencent. It supports 33 language pairs and five Chinese dialect and minority-language pairs, with workflows for structured, delimiter-based, contextual, glossary-based, and style-guided...
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is a sparse mixture-of-experts model from DeepSeek, with 13B active parameters out of 284B total. This re-post-trained revision is suited for coding, reasoning, and agent workflows....