GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is $0.04 cheaper per 1M input tokens (28.6% lower; 1.4x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥Hunyuan A13B Instruct vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch)
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) when budget and context both matter.
Budget verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is estimated at $0.4 vs $0.42 for Hunyuan A13B Instruct, saving $0.02 (5.9% lower).
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch), balanced workload favors GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch), and output-heavy chatbot favors Hunyuan A13B Instruct.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Hunyuan A13B Instruct | GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) | $0.99 | $0.8 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) | $0.71 | $0.7 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Hunyuan A13B Instruct | $2.99 | $3.1 |
Hunyuan A13B Instruct is $0.03 cheaper per 1M output tokens (5% lower; 1.05x difference).
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) has 918.93K more context (8.01x larger).
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is $0.02 cheaper on the standard workload (5.9% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) has the lower input price; Hunyuan A13B Instruct has the lower output price; GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.42 for Hunyuan A13B Instruct and $0.4 for GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch).
Choose Hunyuan A13B Instruct when you care most about lower output-token price.
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is estimated at $0.4 vs $0.42 for Hunyuan A13B Instruct, saving $0.02 (5.9% lower).
- GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is $0.02 cheaper on the standard workload (5.9% lower).
- GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is $0.04 cheaper per 1M input tokens (28.6% lower; 1.4x difference).
- Hunyuan A13B Instruct is $0.03 cheaper per 1M output tokens (5% lower; 1.05x difference).
- GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) has 918.93K more context (8.01x larger).
| Feature | 🔥Hunyuan A13B Instruct (Tencent) | GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.14 | $0.1 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.57 | $0.6 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.42 | $0.4 |
| Context Window | 131.07K | 1.05M |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #18 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is estimated at $0.4 vs $0.42 for Hunyuan A13B Instruct, saving $0.02 (5.9% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Hunyuan A13B Instruct | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Hy3 (free) can replace Hunyuan A13B Instruct when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Hy-MT2-1.8B can replace Hunyuan A13B Instruct when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- Hy-MT2-30B-A3B can replace Hunyuan A13B Instruct when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.22.
- Hy-MT2-7B can replace Hunyuan A13B Instruct when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.22.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.15 sample workload cost.
- GLM 5.3 Flash offers 1.31M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- GLM Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.13 sample workload cost.
- Hy4 preview · Tencent · #1
- GPT-5.6 Luna · OpenAI · #2
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #3
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsTencent catalog
Review all tracked Tencent models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Tencent modelsOpenAI catalog
Check other OpenAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open OpenAI modelsHunyuan-A13B is a 13B active parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model developed by Tencent, with a total parameter count of 80B and support for reasoning via Chain-of-Thought. It offers competitive benchmark...
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro is the same underlying model as [GPT-5.6 Luna](https://openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-5.6-luna), served with `reasoning.mode` set to `pro` for higher-quality responses on complex tasks. Learn more in OpenAI's docs: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/reasoning#reasoning-mode