Gemma 3 27B is $0.01 cheaper per 1M input tokens (11.1% lower; 1.12x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Step 3.5 Flash vs Gemma 3 27B
Pick Gemma 3 27B for lower cost; pick Step 3.5 Flash only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Gemma 3 27B for lower cost; pick Step 3.5 Flash only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 3 27B is estimated at $0.16 vs $0.24 for Step 3.5 Flash, saving $0.08 (33.3% lower).
Cost-first pickGemma 3 27B
Context-first pickStep 3.5 Flash
Sample savings$0.0833.3%
10x traffic gap$0.8
Step 3.5 Flash has more context, but Gemma 3 27B saves $0.08 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.8. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Gemma 3 27B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Step 3.5 Flash | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Gemma 3 27B | $0.6 | $0.48 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Gemma 3 27B | $0.39 | $0.24 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Gemma 3 27B | $1.59 | $0.88 |
Gemma 3 27B is $0.14 cheaper per 1M output tokens (46.7% lower; 1.88x difference).
Step 3.5 Flash has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
Gemma 3 27B is $0.08 cheaper on the standard workload (33.3% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Gemma 3 27B has the lower input price; Gemma 3 27B has the lower output price; Step 3.5 Flash offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Gemma 3 27B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.24 for Step 3.5 Flash and $0.16 for Gemma 3 27B.
Choose Step 3.5 Flash when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Gemma 3 27B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 3 27B is estimated at $0.16 vs $0.24 for Step 3.5 Flash, saving $0.08 (33.3% lower).
- Gemma 3 27B is $0.08 cheaper on the standard workload (33.3% lower).
- Gemma 3 27B is $0.01 cheaper per 1M input tokens (11.1% lower; 1.12x difference).
- Gemma 3 27B is $0.14 cheaper per 1M output tokens (46.7% lower; 1.88x difference).
- Step 3.5 Flash has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
| Feature | Step 3.5 Flash (StepFun) | Gemma 3 27B (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.09 | $0.08 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.3 | $0.16 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.24 | $0.16 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 131.07K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #43 | #86 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Gemma 3 27B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 3 27B is estimated at $0.16 vs $0.24 for Step 3.5 Flash, saving $0.08 (33.3% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Gemma 3 27B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Gemma 3 27B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Step 3.5 Flash | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemma 3 27B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemma 3 27B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Clip Preview can replace Gemma 3 27B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Gemma 3 27B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.5 offers 1.05M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsStepFun catalog
Review all tracked StepFun models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open StepFun modelsGoogle catalog
Check other Google models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Google modelsStep 3.5 Flash is StepFun's most capable open-source foundation model. Built on a sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture, it selectively activates only 11B of its 196B parameters per token....
Gemma 3 introduces multimodality, supporting vision-language input and text outputs. It handles context windows up to 128k tokens, understands over 140 languages, and offers improved math, reasoning, and chat capabilities,...