API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewSummarize vs GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch)

Pick Summarize for lower cost; pick GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated: 2026-10-13T13:12:15Z Data confirmed: 2026-10-15T02:07:54Z Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Summarize for lower cost; pick GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Summarize is estimated at $0.04 vs $0.17 for GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch), saving $0.13 (77.1% lower).

Cost-first pickSummarize

Context-first pickGPT-6 Luna Pro (batch)

Sample savings$0.1377.1%

10x traffic gap$1.35

GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) has more context, but Summarize saves $0.13 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $1.35. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Summarize stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shape	Token mix	Better pick	Summarize	GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch)
Input-heavy / RAG	5M input + 500K output	Summarize	$0.2	$0.38
Balanced workload	1M input + 1M output	Summarize	$0.04	$0.3
Output-heavy chatbot	1M input + 5M output	Summarize	$0.04	$1.3

Cheaper input Summarize $0.04 vs $0.05 / 1M

Summarize is $0.01 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).

Cheaper output Summarize $0 vs $0.25 / 1M

Summarize is free for output tokens while GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) costs $0.25 per 1M tokens.

Larger context GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) 1M vs 1.05M

GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) has 50K more context (1.05x larger).

Sample workload Summarize $0.04 vs $0.17

Summarize is $0.13 cheaper on the standard workload (77.1% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.

Monthly input tokens Monthly output tokens

Summarize Calculating… Estimated API cost

GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) Calculating… Estimated API cost

Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Summarize has the lower input price; Summarize has the lower output price; GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Summarize is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.04 for Summarize and $0.17 for GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch).

Best Fit

Choose Summarize when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Choose GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) when you care most about larger context window.

Decision Notes

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Summarize is estimated at $0.04 vs $0.17 for GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch), saving $0.13 (77.1% lower).
Summarize is $0.13 cheaper on the standard workload (77.1% lower).
Summarize is $0.01 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
Summarize is free for output tokens while GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) costs $0.25 per 1M tokens.
GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) has 50K more context (1.05x larger).

Head-to-Head Specs

Feature	NewSummarize (ScaleDown)	GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) (OpenAI)
Input Price prompt tokens per 1M	$0.04	$0.05
Completion Price per 1M tokens	$0	$0.25
Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output	$0.04	$0.17
Context Window	1M	1.05M
Release Date	2026-10-13	2026-09-22

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use case	Better pick	Why
Budget-constrained production	Summarize	On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Summarize is estimated at $0.04 vs $0.17 for GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch), saving $0.13 (77.1% lower).
High-volume input processing	Summarize	Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbots	Summarize	Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document work	GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch)	A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps

gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.06.
gpt-oss-20b (batch) can replace GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.08.

Larger context near this budget

No larger-context model is currently tracked within a close sample-cost band.

Popular competitors

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
Step 5 Preview · StepFun · #2
GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #3
MiMo-V2.6-Flash · Xiaomi · #4

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

ScaleDown catalog

Review all tracked ScaleDown models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open ScaleDown models

OpenAI catalog

Check other OpenAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open OpenAI models

Summarize

Summarize is an abstractive summarization model from ScaleDown. It condenses long text and documents into a fluent, faithful rewrite rather than lifting sentences from the source, and is suited for...

GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch)

GPT-6 Luna Pro is the same underlying model as [GPT-6 Luna](https://openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-6-luna), served with `reasoning.mode` set to `pro` for higher-quality responses on complex tasks. **Cost note:** pro mode spends far more...