LFM2-24B-A2B is $0.01 cheaper per 1M input tokens (25% lower; 1.33x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Llama 3 8B Lunaris vs LFM2-24B-A2B
Pick Llama 3 8B Lunaris for lower cost; pick LFM2-24B-A2B only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Llama 3 8B Lunaris for lower cost; pick LFM2-24B-A2B only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Llama 3 8B Lunaris is estimated at $0.07 vs $0.09 for LFM2-24B-A2B, saving $0.02 (27.8% lower).
Cost-first pickLlama 3 8B Lunaris
Context-first pickLFM2-24B-A2B
Sample savings$0.0227.8%
10x traffic gap$0.25
LFM2-24B-A2B has more context, but Llama 3 8B Lunaris saves $0.02 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors LFM2-24B-A2B, balanced workload favors Llama 3 8B Lunaris, and output-heavy chatbot favors Llama 3 8B Lunaris.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Llama 3 8B Lunaris | LFM2-24B-A2B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | LFM2-24B-A2B | $0.23 | $0.21 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Llama 3 8B Lunaris | $0.09 | $0.15 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Llama 3 8B Lunaris | $0.29 | $0.63 |
Llama 3 8B Lunaris is $0.07 cheaper per 1M output tokens (58.3% lower; 2.4x difference).
LFM2-24B-A2B has 119.81K more context (15.6x larger).
Llama 3 8B Lunaris is $0.02 cheaper on the standard workload (27.8% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
LFM2-24B-A2B has the lower input price; Llama 3 8B Lunaris has the lower output price; LFM2-24B-A2B offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Llama 3 8B Lunaris is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.07 for Llama 3 8B Lunaris and $0.09 for LFM2-24B-A2B.
Choose Llama 3 8B Lunaris when you care most about lower output-token price.
Choose LFM2-24B-A2B when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Llama 3 8B Lunaris is estimated at $0.07 vs $0.09 for LFM2-24B-A2B, saving $0.02 (27.8% lower).
- Llama 3 8B Lunaris is $0.02 cheaper on the standard workload (27.8% lower).
- LFM2-24B-A2B is $0.01 cheaper per 1M input tokens (25% lower; 1.33x difference).
- Llama 3 8B Lunaris is $0.07 cheaper per 1M output tokens (58.3% lower; 2.4x difference).
- LFM2-24B-A2B has 119.81K more context (15.6x larger).
| Feature | Llama 3 8B Lunaris (Sao10K) | LFM2-24B-A2B (LiquidAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.04 | $0.03 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.05 | $0.12 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.07 | $0.09 |
| Context Window | 8.19K | 128K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #115 | #125 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Llama 3 8B Lunaris | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Llama 3 8B Lunaris is estimated at $0.07 vs $0.09 for LFM2-24B-A2B, saving $0.02 (27.8% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | LFM2-24B-A2B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Llama 3 8B Lunaris | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | LFM2-24B-A2B | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) can replace LFM2-24B-A2B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct (free) can replace LFM2-24B-A2B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- Lyria 3 Clip Preview offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsSao10K catalog
Review all tracked Sao10K models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Sao10K modelsLiquidAI catalog
Check other LiquidAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open LiquidAI modelsLunaris 8B is a versatile generalist and roleplaying model based on Llama 3. It's a strategic merge of multiple models, designed to balance creativity with improved logic and general knowledge....
LFM2-24B-A2B is the largest model in the LFM2 family of hybrid architectures designed for efficient on-device deployment. Built as a 24B parameter Mixture-of-Experts model with only 2B active parameters per...