Sakana Namazu is $0.55 cheaper per 1M input tokens (36.7% lower; 1.58x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Sakana Namazu vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Pick Sakana Namazu when budget is the priority.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Sakana Namazu when budget is the priority.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Sakana Namazu is estimated at $2.95 vs $5.25 for Mistral Medium 3.5, saving $2.3 (43.8% lower).
Cost-first pickSakana Namazu
Context-first pickBoth models
Sample savings$2.343.8%
10x traffic gap$23
The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $23. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Sakana Namazu stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Sakana Namazu | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Sakana Namazu | $6.75 | $11.25 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Sakana Namazu | $4.95 | $9 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Sakana Namazu | $20.95 | $39 |
Sakana Namazu is $3.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (46.7% lower; 1.88x difference).
Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.
Sakana Namazu is $2.3 cheaper on the standard workload (43.8% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Sakana Namazu has the lower input price; Sakana Namazu has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Sakana Namazu is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $2.95 for Sakana Namazu and $5.25 for Mistral Medium 3.5.
Choose Sakana Namazu when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Sakana Namazu is estimated at $2.95 vs $5.25 for Mistral Medium 3.5, saving $2.3 (43.8% lower).
- Sakana Namazu is $2.3 cheaper on the standard workload (43.8% lower).
- Sakana Namazu is $0.55 cheaper per 1M input tokens (36.7% lower; 1.58x difference).
- Sakana Namazu is $3.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (46.7% lower; 1.88x difference).
- Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.
| Feature | Sakana Namazu (Sakana) | Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.95 | $1.5 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $4 | $7.5 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $2.95 | $5.25 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 262.14K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Sakana Namazu | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Sakana Namazu is estimated at $2.95 vs $5.25 for Mistral Medium 3.5, saving $2.3 (43.8% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Sakana Namazu | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Sakana Namazu | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Tie | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Mistral Nemo can replace Mistral Medium 3.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.03.
- Mistral Small 3 can replace Mistral Medium 3.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
- Ministral 3 3B 2512 can replace Mistral Medium 3.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
- Ministral 8B can replace Mistral Medium 3.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.17.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.17 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.11 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
- Hy3 · Tencent · #3
- Ox Alpha · stealth · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsSakana catalog
Review all tracked Sakana models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Sakana modelsMistral catalog
Check other Mistral models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Mistral modelsSakana Namazu is a Japanese-specialized reasoning model from Sakana AI, based on Kimi K2.6 with additional training for Japanese language and business contexts. It is suited for Japanese instruction following,...
Mistral Medium 3.5 is a dense 128B instruction-following model from Mistral AI. It supports text and image inputs with text output, and is designed for agentic workflows, coding, and complex...