Fugu Ultra is $25 cheaper per 1M input tokens (83.3% lower; 6x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Fugu Ultra vs GPT-5.5 Pro
Pick Fugu Ultra for lower cost; pick GPT-5.5 Pro only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Fugu Ultra for lower cost; pick GPT-5.5 Pro only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Fugu Ultra is estimated at $20 vs $120 for GPT-5.5 Pro, saving $100 (83.3% lower).
Cost-first pickFugu Ultra
Context-first pickGPT-5.5 Pro
Sample savings$10083.3%
10x traffic gap$1000
GPT-5.5 Pro has more context, but Fugu Ultra saves $100 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $1000. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Fugu Ultra stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Fugu Ultra | GPT-5.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Fugu Ultra | $40 | $240 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Fugu Ultra | $35 | $210 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Fugu Ultra | $155 | $930 |
Fugu Ultra is $150 cheaper per 1M output tokens (83.3% lower; 6x difference).
GPT-5.5 Pro has 50K more context (1.05x larger).
Fugu Ultra is $100 cheaper on the standard workload (83.3% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Fugu Ultra has the lower input price; Fugu Ultra has the lower output price; GPT-5.5 Pro offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Fugu Ultra is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $20 for Fugu Ultra and $120 for GPT-5.5 Pro.
Choose Fugu Ultra when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose GPT-5.5 Pro when you care most about larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Fugu Ultra is estimated at $20 vs $120 for GPT-5.5 Pro, saving $100 (83.3% lower).
- Fugu Ultra is $100 cheaper on the standard workload (83.3% lower).
- Fugu Ultra is $25 cheaper per 1M input tokens (83.3% lower; 6x difference).
- Fugu Ultra is $150 cheaper per 1M output tokens (83.3% lower; 6x difference).
- GPT-5.5 Pro has 50K more context (1.05x larger).
| Feature | Fugu Ultra (Sakana) | GPT-5.5 Pro (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $5 | $30 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $30 | $180 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $20 | $120 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Fugu Ultra | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Fugu Ultra is estimated at $20 vs $120 for GPT-5.5 Pro, saving $100 (83.3% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Fugu Ultra | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Fugu Ultra | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GPT-5.5 Pro | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Sakana Namazu can replace Fugu Ultra when lower sample workload cost matters most: $2.95.
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-5.5 Pro when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-5.5 Pro when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-5.5 Pro when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.17 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.11 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
- Hy3 · Tencent · #3
- Ox Alpha · stealth · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsSakana catalog
Review all tracked Sakana models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Sakana modelsOpenAI catalog
Check other OpenAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open OpenAI modelsFugu Ultra is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to route...
GPT-5.5 Pro is OpenAI’s high-capability model optimized for deep reasoning and accuracy on complex, high-stakes workloads. It features a 1M+ token context window (922K input, 128K output) with support for...