API cost decision in 10 seconds

Relace Search vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507

Pick Voxtral Small 24B 2507 for lower cost; pick Relace Search only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Voxtral Small 24B 2507 for lower cost; pick Relace Search only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is estimated at $0.25 vs $2.5 for Relace Search, saving $2.25 (90% lower).

Cost-first pickVoxtral Small 24B 2507
Context-first pickRelace Search
Sample savings$2.2590%
10x traffic gap$22.5

Relace Search has more context, but Voxtral Small 24B 2507 saves $2.25 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $22.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickRelace SearchVoxtral Small 24B 2507
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputVoxtral Small 24B 2507$6.5$0.65
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputVoxtral Small 24B 2507$4$0.4
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputVoxtral Small 24B 2507$16$1.6
Cheaper input Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $1 vs $0.1 / 1M

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is $0.9 cheaper per 1M input tokens (90% lower; 10x difference).

Cheaper output Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $3 vs $0.3 / 1M

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is $2.7 cheaper per 1M output tokens (90% lower; 10x difference).

Larger context Relace Search 256K vs 32K

Relace Search has 224K more context (8x larger).

Sample workload Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $2.5 vs $0.25

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is $2.25 cheaper on the standard workload (90% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Relace Search Calculating… Estimated API cost
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has the lower input price; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has the lower output price; Relace Search offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $2.5 for Relace Search and $0.25 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507.

Best Fit

Choose Relace Search when you care most about larger context window.

Choose Voxtral Small 24B 2507 when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is estimated at $0.25 vs $2.5 for Relace Search, saving $2.25 (90% lower).
  • Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is $2.25 cheaper on the standard workload (90% lower).
  • Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is $0.9 cheaper per 1M input tokens (90% lower; 10x difference).
  • Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is $2.7 cheaper per 1M output tokens (90% lower; 10x difference).
  • Relace Search has 224K more context (8x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureRelace Search
(Relace)		Voxtral Small 24B 2507
(Mistral)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M		$1$0.1
Completion Price
per 1M tokens		$3$0.3
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output		$2.5$0.25
Context Window256K32K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionVoxtral Small 24B 2507On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is estimated at $0.25 vs $2.5 for Relace Search, saving $2.25 (90% lower).
High-volume input processingVoxtral Small 24B 2507Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsVoxtral Small 24B 2507Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workRelace SearchA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • Relace Apply 3 can replace Relace Search when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.48.
  • Mistral Nemo can replace Voxtral Small 24B 2507 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.04.
  • Mistral Small 3 can replace Voxtral Small 24B 2507 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
  • Ministral 3 3B 2512 can replace Voxtral Small 24B 2507 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
Larger context near this budget
  • Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
  • Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
  • Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Relace catalog

Review all tracked Relace models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Relace models

Mistral catalog

Check other Mistral models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Mistral models
Relace Search

The relace-search model uses 4-12 `view_file` and `grep` tools in parallel to explore a codebase and return relevant files to the user request. In contrast to RAG, relace-search performs agentic...

Voxtral Small 24B 2507

Voxtral Small is an enhancement of Mistral Small 3, incorporating state-of-the-art audio input capabilities while retaining best-in-class text performance. It excels at speech transcription, translation and audio understanding. Input audio...