API cost decision in 10 seconds

Relace Search vs Cogito v2.1 671B

Pick Cogito v2.1 671B for lower cost; pick Relace Search only if the larger context window matters more.

Pricing data updated: 2026-05-26T11:08:00Z Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Cogito v2.1 671B for lower cost; pick Relace Search only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Cogito v2.1 671B is estimated at $1.88 vs $2.5 for Relace Search, saving $0.62 (25% lower).

Cost-first pickCogito v2.1 671B

Context-first pickRelace Search

Sample savings$0.6225%

10x traffic gap$6.25

Relace Search has more context, but Cogito v2.1 671B saves $0.62 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $6.25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Relace Search, balanced workload favors Cogito v2.1 671B, and output-heavy chatbot favors Cogito v2.1 671B.

Workload shape	Token mix	Better pick	Relace Search	Cogito v2.1 671B
Input-heavy / RAG	5M input + 500K output	Relace Search	$6.5	$6.88
Balanced workload	1M input + 1M output	Cogito v2.1 671B	$4	$2.5
Output-heavy chatbot	1M input + 5M output	Cogito v2.1 671B	$16	$7.5

Cheaper input Relace Search $1 vs $1.25 / 1M

Relace Search is $0.25 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).

Cheaper output Cogito v2.1 671B $3 vs $1.25 / 1M

Cogito v2.1 671B is $1.75 cheaper per 1M output tokens (58.3% lower; 2.4x difference).

Larger context Relace Search 256K vs 128K

Relace Search has 128K more context (2x larger).

Sample workload Cogito v2.1 671B $2.5 vs $1.88

Cogito v2.1 671B is $0.62 cheaper on the standard workload (25% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.

Monthly input tokens Monthly output tokens

Relace Search Calculating… Estimated API cost

Cogito v2.1 671B Calculating… Estimated API cost

Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Relace Search has the lower input price; Cogito v2.1 671B has the lower output price; Relace Search offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Cogito v2.1 671B is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $2.5 for Relace Search and $1.88 for Cogito v2.1 671B.

Best Fit

Choose Relace Search when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.

Choose Cogito v2.1 671B when you care most about lower output-token price.

Decision Notes

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Cogito v2.1 671B is estimated at $1.88 vs $2.5 for Relace Search, saving $0.62 (25% lower).
Cogito v2.1 671B is $0.62 cheaper on the standard workload (25% lower).
Relace Search is $0.25 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
Cogito v2.1 671B is $1.75 cheaper per 1M output tokens (58.3% lower; 2.4x difference).
Relace Search has 128K more context (2x larger).

Head-to-Head Specs

Feature	Relace Search (Relace)	Cogito v2.1 671B (Deep Cogito)
Input Price prompt tokens per 1M	$1	$1.25
Completion Price per 1M tokens	$3	$1.25
Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output	$2.5	$1.88
Context Window	256K	128K
Release Date	2025-12-08	2025-11-13

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use case	Better pick	Why
Budget-constrained production	Cogito v2.1 671B	On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Cogito v2.1 671B is estimated at $1.88 vs $2.5 for Relace Search, saving $0.62 (25% lower).
High-volume input processing	Relace Search	Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbots	Cogito v2.1 671B	Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document work	Relace Search	A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps

Relace Apply 3 can replace Relace Search when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.48.

Larger context near this budget

Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite offers 1.05M context with $1 sample workload cost.

Popular competitors

No popular competitor is currently available.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Relace catalog

Review all tracked Relace models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Relace models

Deep Cogito catalog

Check other Deep Cogito models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Deep Cogito models

Relace Search

The relace-search model uses 4-12 `view_file` and `grep` tools in parallel to explore a codebase and return relevant files to the user request. In contrast to RAG, relace-search performs agentic...

Cogito v2.1 671B

Cogito v2.1 671B MoE represents one of the strongest open models globally, matching performance of frontier closed and open models. This model is trained using self play with reinforcement learning...