API cost decision in 10 seconds

Reka Edge vs Relace Search

Pick Reka Edge for lower cost; pick Relace Search only if the larger context window matters more.

Pricing data updated: 2026-05-26T11:08:00Z Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Reka Edge for lower cost; pick Relace Search only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Reka Edge is estimated at $0.15 vs $2.5 for Relace Search, saving $2.35 (94% lower).

Cost-first pickReka Edge

Context-first pickRelace Search

Sample savings$2.3594%

10x traffic gap$23.5

Relace Search has more context, but Reka Edge saves $2.35 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $23.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Reka Edge stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shape	Token mix	Better pick	Reka Edge	Relace Search
Input-heavy / RAG	5M input + 500K output	Reka Edge	$0.55	$6.5
Balanced workload	1M input + 1M output	Reka Edge	$0.2	$4
Output-heavy chatbot	1M input + 5M output	Reka Edge	$0.6	$16

Cheaper input Reka Edge $0.1 vs $1 / 1M

Reka Edge is $0.9 cheaper per 1M input tokens (90% lower; 10x difference).

Cheaper output Reka Edge $0.1 vs $3 / 1M

Reka Edge is $2.9 cheaper per 1M output tokens (96.7% lower; 30x difference).

Larger context Relace Search 16.38K vs 256K

Relace Search has 239.62K more context (15.6x larger).

Sample workload Reka Edge $0.15 vs $2.5

Reka Edge is $2.35 cheaper on the standard workload (94% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.

Monthly input tokens Monthly output tokens

Reka Edge Calculating… Estimated API cost

Relace Search Calculating… Estimated API cost

Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Reka Edge has the lower input price; Reka Edge has the lower output price; Relace Search offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Reka Edge is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.15 for Reka Edge and $2.5 for Relace Search.

Best Fit

Choose Reka Edge when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Choose Relace Search when you care most about larger context window.

Decision Notes

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Reka Edge is estimated at $0.15 vs $2.5 for Relace Search, saving $2.35 (94% lower).
Reka Edge is $2.35 cheaper on the standard workload (94% lower).
Reka Edge is $0.9 cheaper per 1M input tokens (90% lower; 10x difference).
Reka Edge is $2.9 cheaper per 1M output tokens (96.7% lower; 30x difference).
Relace Search has 239.62K more context (15.6x larger).

Head-to-Head Specs

Feature	Reka Edge (rekaai)	Relace Search (Relace)
Input Price prompt tokens per 1M	$0.1	$1
Completion Price per 1M tokens	$0.1	$3
Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output	$0.15	$2.5
Context Window	16.38K	256K
Release Date	2026-03-20	2025-12-08

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use case	Better pick	Why
Budget-constrained production	Reka Edge	On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Reka Edge is estimated at $0.15 vs $2.5 for Relace Search, saving $2.35 (94% lower).
High-volume input processing	Reka Edge	Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbots	Reka Edge	Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document work	Relace Search	A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps

Relace Apply 3 can replace Relace Search when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.48.

Larger context near this budget

Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite offers 1.05M context with $1 sample workload cost.

Popular competitors

No popular competitor is currently available.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

rekaai catalog

Review all tracked rekaai models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open rekaai models

Relace catalog

Check other Relace models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Relace models

Reka Edge

Reka Edge is an extremely efficient 7B multimodal vision-language model that accepts image/video+text inputs and generates text outputs. This model is optimized specifically to deliver industry-leading performance in image understanding,...

Relace Search

The relace-search model uses 4-12 `view_file` and `grep` tools in parallel to explore a codebase and return relevant files to the user request. In contrast to RAG, relace-search performs agentic...