API cost decision in 10 seconds

Reka Edge vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

The standard workload cost is tied; choose by context window, provider fit, latency, or model quality.

Pricing data updated:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

The standard workload cost is tied; choose by context window, provider fit, latency, or model quality.

Both models are estimated at $0.15 for the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Cost-first pickTie
Context-first pickNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Sample savings$00%
10x traffic gap$0

Context-window winner: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B. Cost does not separate this pair on the standard workload, so the next decision point is context window and model behavior.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, balanced workload favors Reka Edge, and output-heavy chatbot favors Reka Edge.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickReka EdgeNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.55$0.35
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputReka Edge$0.2$0.25
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputReka Edge$0.6$1.05
Cheaper input Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B $0.1 vs $0.05 / 1M

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is $0.05 cheaper per 1M input tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).

Cheaper output Reka Edge $0.1 vs $0.2 / 1M

Reka Edge is $0.1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).

Larger context Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 16.38K vs 262.14K

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 245.76K more context (16x larger).

Sample workload Tie $0.15 vs $0.15

Both models have the same estimated cost for the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload: $0.15.

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Reka Edge Calculating… Estimated API cost
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has the lower input price; Reka Edge has the lower output price; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, the standard workload cost is tied.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.15 for Reka Edge and $0.15 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.

Best Fit

Choose Reka Edge when you care most about lower output-token price.

Choose Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.

Decision Notes
  • Both models are estimated at $0.15 for the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
  • Both models have the same estimated cost for the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload: $0.15.
  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is $0.05 cheaper per 1M input tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
  • Reka Edge is $0.1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 245.76K more context (16x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureReka Edge
(rekaai)
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
(NVIDIA)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$0.1$0.05
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$0.1$0.2
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$0.15$0.15
Context Window16.38K262.14K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionTieBoth models are estimated at $0.15 for the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
High-volume input processingNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsReka EdgeLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Popular competitors
  • No popular competitor is currently available.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

rekaai catalog

Review all tracked rekaai models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open rekaai models

NVIDIA catalog

Check other NVIDIA models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open NVIDIA models
Reka Edge

Reka Edge is an extremely efficient 7B multimodal vision-language model that accepts image/video+text inputs and generates text outputs. This model is optimized specifically to deliver industry-leading performance in image understanding,...

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is a small language MoE model with highest compute efficiency and accuracy for developers to build specialized agentic AI systems. The model is fully...