Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is $0.34 cheaper per 1M input tokens (56.7% lower; 2.31x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Kimi K2 Thinking
Pick Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking for lower cost; pick Kimi K2 Thinking only if the larger context window matters more.
Budget verdict
Pick Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking for lower cost; pick Kimi K2 Thinking only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is estimated at $1.56 vs $1.85 for Kimi K2 Thinking, saving $0.29 (15.7% lower).
Kimi K2 Thinking has more context, but Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking saves $0.29 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $2.9. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking, balanced workload favors Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking, and output-heavy chatbot favors Kimi K2 Thinking.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking | Kimi K2 Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking | $2.6 | $4.25 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking | $2.86 | $3.1 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Kimi K2 Thinking | $13.26 | $13.1 |
Kimi K2 Thinking is $0.1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (3.8% lower; 1.04x difference).
Kimi K2 Thinking has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is $0.29 cheaper on the standard workload (15.7% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking has the lower input price; Kimi K2 Thinking has the lower output price; Kimi K2 Thinking offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.56 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and $1.85 for Kimi K2 Thinking.
Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking when you care most about lower input-token price.
Choose Kimi K2 Thinking when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is estimated at $1.56 vs $1.85 for Kimi K2 Thinking, saving $0.29 (15.7% lower).
- Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is $0.29 cheaper on the standard workload (15.7% lower).
- Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is $0.34 cheaper per 1M input tokens (56.7% lower; 2.31x difference).
- Kimi K2 Thinking is $0.1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (3.8% lower; 1.04x difference).
- Kimi K2 Thinking has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
| Feature | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking (Qwen) | Kimi K2 Thinking (MoonshotAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.26 | $0.6 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $2.6 | $2.5 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $1.56 | $1.85 |
| Context Window | 131.07K | 262.14K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #103 | #144 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is estimated at $1.56 vs $1.85 for Kimi K2 Thinking, saving $0.29 (15.7% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Kimi K2 Thinking | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Kimi K2 Thinking | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (free) can replace Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (free) can replace Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct can replace Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
- Qwen3.5-9B can replace Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.11.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.5 offers 1.05M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #1
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #3
- Owl Alpha · OpenRouter · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsQwen catalog
Review all tracked Qwen models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Qwen modelsMoonshotAI catalog
Check other MoonshotAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open MoonshotAI modelsQwen3-VL-235B-A22B Thinking is a multimodal model that unifies strong text generation with visual understanding across images and video. The Thinking model is optimized for multimodal reasoning in STEM and math....
Kimi K2 Thinking is Moonshot AI’s most advanced open reasoning model to date, extending the K2 series into agentic, long-horizon reasoning. Built on the trillion-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture introduced in...