Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is $0.03 cheaper per 1M input tokens (12% lower; 1.14x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Claude 3 Haiku
Pick Claude 3 Haiku for lower cost; pick Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Claude 3 Haiku for lower cost; pick Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude 3 Haiku is estimated at $0.88 vs $1.12 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B, saving $0.25 (21.9% lower).
Cost-first pickClaude 3 Haiku
Context-first pickQwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Sample savings$0.2521.9%
10x traffic gap$2.45
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B has more context, but Claude 3 Haiku saves $0.25 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $2.45. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Claude 3 Haiku stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | Claude 3 Haiku |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Claude 3 Haiku | $2 | $1.88 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Claude 3 Haiku | $2.02 | $1.5 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Claude 3 Haiku | $9.22 | $6.5 |
Claude 3 Haiku is $0.55 cheaper per 1M output tokens (30.6% lower; 1.44x difference).
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B has 848.58K more context (5.24x larger).
Claude 3 Haiku is $0.25 cheaper on the standard workload (21.9% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B has the lower input price; Claude 3 Haiku has the lower output price; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Claude 3 Haiku is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.12 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and $0.88 for Claude 3 Haiku.
Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Claude 3 Haiku when you care most about lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude 3 Haiku is estimated at $0.88 vs $1.12 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B, saving $0.25 (21.9% lower).
- Claude 3 Haiku is $0.25 cheaper on the standard workload (21.9% lower).
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is $0.03 cheaper per 1M input tokens (12% lower; 1.14x difference).
- Claude 3 Haiku is $0.55 cheaper per 1M output tokens (30.6% lower; 1.44x difference).
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B has 848.58K more context (5.24x larger).
| Feature | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (Qwen) | Claude 3 Haiku (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.22 | $0.25 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $1.8 | $1.25 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $1.12 | $0.88 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 200K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #76 | #150 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Claude 3 Haiku | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude 3 Haiku is estimated at $0.88 vs $1.12 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B, saving $0.25 (21.9% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Claude 3 Haiku | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (free) can replace Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (free) can replace Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct can replace Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
- Qwen3.5-9B can replace Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.11.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #1
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #2
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsQwen catalog
Review all tracked Qwen models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Qwen modelsAnthropic catalog
Check other Anthropic models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Anthropic modelsQwen3-Coder-480B-A35B-Instruct is a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) code generation model developed by the Qwen team. It is optimized for agentic coding tasks such as function calling, tool use, and long-context reasoning over...
Claude 3 Haiku is Anthropic's fastest and most compact model for near-instant responsiveness. Quick and accurate targeted performance. See the launch announcement and benchmark results [here](https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-3-haiku) #multimodal