GPT Luna Latest is $0.05 cheaper per 1M input tokens (33.3% lower; 1.5x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT Luna Latest
Pick GPT Luna Latest when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick GPT Luna Latest when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT Luna Latest is estimated at $0.35 vs $0.39 for Qwen3.8 Omni Flash, saving $0.04 (9.1% lower).
Cost-first pickGPT Luna Latest
Context-first pickGPT Luna Latest
Sample savings$0.049.1%
10x traffic gap$0.35
GPT Luna Latest is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.35. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors GPT Luna Latest, balanced workload favors GPT Luna Latest, and output-heavy chatbot favors Qwen3.8 Omni Flash.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | GPT Luna Latest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | GPT Luna Latest | $0.98 | $0.75 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | GPT Luna Latest | $0.62 | $0.6 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | $2.5 | $2.6 |
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is $0.03 cheaper per 1M output tokens (6% lower; 1.06x difference).
GPT Luna Latest has 50K more context (1.05x larger).
GPT Luna Latest is $0.04 cheaper on the standard workload (9.1% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
GPT Luna Latest has the lower input price; Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the lower output price; GPT Luna Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GPT Luna Latest is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.39 for Qwen3.8 Omni Flash and $0.35 for GPT Luna Latest.
Choose Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when you care most about lower output-token price.
Choose GPT Luna Latest when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT Luna Latest is estimated at $0.35 vs $0.39 for Qwen3.8 Omni Flash, saving $0.04 (9.1% lower).
- GPT Luna Latest is $0.04 cheaper on the standard workload (9.1% lower).
- GPT Luna Latest is $0.05 cheaper per 1M input tokens (33.3% lower; 1.5x difference).
- Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is $0.03 cheaper per 1M output tokens (6% lower; 1.06x difference).
- GPT Luna Latest has 50K more context (1.05x larger).
| Feature | NewQwen3.8 Omni Flash (Qwen) | GPT Luna Latest (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.15 | $0.1 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.47 | $0.5 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.39 | $0.35 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | GPT Luna Latest | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT Luna Latest is estimated at $0.35 vs $0.39 for Qwen3.8 Omni Flash, saving $0.04 (9.1% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | GPT Luna Latest | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GPT Luna Latest | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Qwen3.8 27B (free) can replace Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (free) can replace Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (free) can replace Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen3.7 Flash can replace Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- GLM 5.3 Flash offers 1.31M context with $0.4 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.36 sample workload cost.
- GLM Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.43 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro · Xiaomi · #1
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) · Qwen · #2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #3
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsQwen catalog
Review all tracked Qwen models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Qwen modelsOpenAI catalog
Check other OpenAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open OpenAI modelsQwen3.8 Omni Flash is an omni-modal reasoning model from Alibaba, the first Qwen model built around agentic capabilities with native audio-video understanding. It is suited for audio-video analysis and summarization,...
This model always redirects to the latest model in the GPT Luna family.